{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2017-1270 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2017-1270 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2017-1270 is a low-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Ibm Security Guardium, published on 20 Dec 2017. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2017-1270 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2017-1270 is a low-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Ibm Security Guardium, published on 20 Dec 2017. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2017-1270 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Ibm Security Guardium. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-1270/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-1270/index.md)","id":"CVE-2017-1270","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-1270/index.md","name":"CVE-2017-1270","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-c8r8-7c4g-6g99"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IBM Security Guardium","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can hijack user sessions in IBM Security Guardium due to lack of session variable renewal after authentication, leading to account takeover.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"auth_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"ibm","cpe":[{"product":"security_guardium","vendor":"ibm"}],"cvss":{"score":3.3,"severity":"low","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-384","name":"Session Fixation"}],"description":"IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not renew a session variable after a successful authentication which could lead to session fixation/hijacking vulnerability. This could force a user to utilize a cookie that may be known to an attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 124745.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Auth bypass in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2017-1270","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"ibm:security_guardium","products":["ibm:security_guardium"],"type":"auth_bypass","year":"2017"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Weak cryptography in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2017-1271"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"SQL injection in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2017-1269"},"products":["Security Guardium"],"published":"2017-12-20","related":[{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"IBM Security Guardium command execution","id":"CVE-2023-35893","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-16"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Command injection in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2017-1253","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-07-05"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2017-1269","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-07-05"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"IBM Security Guardium command injection","id":"CVE-2023-47709","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-05-11"},{"cvss_score":8.9,"headline":"IBM Security Guardium cross-site scripting","id":"CVE-2023-30435","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-27"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Privilege escalation in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2020-4952","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-01-27"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Command injection in Security Guardium","id":"CVE-2020-4180","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-06-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["IBM"]},"summary":"Attackers can hijack user sessions in IBM Security Guardium due to lack of session variable renewal after authentication, leading to account takeover.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-1270/"}