{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2017-18036 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2017-18036 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2017-18036 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Atlassian Bitbucket Server, published on 2 Feb 2018. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2017-18036 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2017-18036 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Atlassian Bitbucket Server, published on 2 Feb 2018. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2017-18036 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Atlassian Bitbucket Server. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-18036/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-18036/index.md)","id":"CVE-2017-18036","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-18036/index.md","name":"CVE-2017-18036","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-mj3p-gh52-6479"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Bitbucket Server","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote attackers can determine if internal services have open ports via Server Side Request Forgery in the GitHub repository importer.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"atlassian","cpe":[{"product":"bitbucket","vendor":"atlassian"}],"cvss":{"score":4.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"The Github repository importer in Atlassian Bitbucket Server before version 5.3.0 allows remote attackers to determine if a service they could not otherwise reach has open ports via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Server-side request forgery in Bitbucket Server","id":"CVE-2017-18036","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"ssrf","year":"2017"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Path traversal in Bitbucket Server","id":"CVE-2017-18037"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Missing authorization in Fisheye and Crucible","id":"CVE-2017-18035"},"products":["Bitbucket Server"],"published":"2018-02-02","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Data Center Command Injection","id":"CVE-2022-36804","kev_date_added":"2022-09-30","published":"2022-08-25"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Path traversal in Bitbucket Server","id":"CVE-2018-5225","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-03-22"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Command injection in Bitbucket Data Center","id":"CVE-2022-43781","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-11-17"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Command injection in Bitbucket Data Center","id":"CVE-2019-15000","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-09-19"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Path traversal in Bitbucket Data Center","id":"CVE-2019-3397","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-06-03"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Command injection in Bitbucket Data Center","id":"CVE-2019-15010","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-01-15"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Path traversal in Bitbucket Data Center","id":"CVE-2019-15012","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-01-15"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["Atlassian"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can determine if internal services have open ports via Server Side Request Forgery in the GitHub repository importer.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2017-18036/"}