{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2018-0134 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2018-0134 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2018-0134 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Cisco Policy Suite, published on 8 Feb 2018. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2018-0134 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2018-0134 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Cisco Policy Suite, published on 8 Feb 2018. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2018-0134 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Cisco Policy Suite. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2018-0134/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2018-0134/index.md)","id":"CVE-2018-0134","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2018-0134/index.md","name":"CVE-2018-0134","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-rm29-q8c8-prwc"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Cisco Policy Suite","requires_auth":"none","summary":"An unauthenticated remote attacker can determine valid subscriber usernames by analyzing distinct RADIUS authentication failure messages.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"cisco","cpe":[{"product":"mobility_services_engine","vendor":"cisco"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-203","name":"Observable Discrepancy"},{"id":"CWE-200","name":"Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"}],"description":"A vulnerability in the RADIUS authentication module of Cisco Policy Suite could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to determine whether a subscriber username is valid. The vulnerability occurs because the Cisco Policy Suite RADIUS server component returns different authentication failure messages based on the validity of usernames. An attacker could use these messages to determine whether a valid subscriber username has been identified. The attacker could use this information in subsequent attacks against the system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg47830.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Information disclosure in Cisco Policy Suite","id":"CVE-2018-0134","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2018"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Information disclosure in Cisco Unified Communications Manager","id":"CVE-2018-0135"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in Cisco IOS XR","id":"CVE-2018-0132"},"products":["Cisco Policy Suite"],"published":"2018-02-08","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in Cisco Policy Suite unknown","id":"CVE-2018-0374","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Hardcoded credentials in Cisco Policy Suite unknown","id":"CVE-2018-0375","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in Cisco Policy Suite unknown","id":"CVE-2018-0376","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in Cisco Policy Suite unknown","id":"CVE-2018-0377","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":7.2,"headline":"Auth bypass in Cisco Policy Suite","id":"CVE-2018-0116","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-02-08"},{"cvss_score":6.9,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-4282","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2015-11-06"},{"cvss_score":6.7,"headline":"Privilege escalation in Cisco Mobility Express 2800 and 3800 Series Wireless LAN Controllers","id":"CVE-2016-9197","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-04-07"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-12-02","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"An unauthenticated remote attacker can determine valid subscriber usernames by analyzing distinct RADIUS authentication failure messages.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2018-0134/"}