{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including froxlor/froxlor. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-10235 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to 0.10.14 or later.","what":"CVE-2020-10235 is a high-severity command injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 9 Mar 2020. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2020-10235 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2020-10235 is a high-severity command injection vulnerability in n/a, published on 9 Mar 2020. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-10235 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 0.10.14\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 0.10.14\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-10235/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-10235/index.md)","id":"CVE-2020-10235","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-10235/index.md","name":"CVE-2020-10235","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-p29c-jpgj-v57r"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["code_execution"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"Froxlor hosting panel","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Remote attackers with installation access can execute arbitrary code via unescaped database configuration options in Froxlor.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"command_injection"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"froxlor","vendor":"froxlor"}],"cvss":{"score":8.8,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-78","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command"},{"id":"CWE-116","name":"Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output"}],"description":"An issue was discovered in Froxlor before 0.10.14. Remote attackers with access to the installation routine could have executed arbitrary code via the database configuration options that were passed unescaped to exec, because of _backupExistingDatabase in install/lib/class.FroxlorInstall.php.","ecosystems":["Packagist"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Froxlor arbitrary code execution via the database configuration options","id":"CVE-2020-10235","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Packagist","product":null,"products":[],"type":"command_injection","year":"2020"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Froxlor Information Disclosure","id":"CVE-2020-10236"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["0.10.14"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-p29c-jpgj-v57r"},{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["0.10.14"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":"pkg:composer/froxlor/froxlor","source":"GHSA-p29c-jpgj-v57r"}],"prev":{"headline":"Null dereference in n/a","id":"CVE-2020-10234"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2020-03-09","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Froxlor has Local File Inclusion via path traversal in API `def_language` parameter that leads to Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2026-41228","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-23"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Improper Link Resolution Before File Access in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-6069","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-11-10"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Code Injection in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-0671","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-02-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-3173","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-06-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-1307","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-03-10"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Froxlor SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2021-42325","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-10-12"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-5959","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-09-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-04","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers with installation access can execute arbitrary code via unescaped database configuration options in Froxlor.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-10235/"}