# CVE-2020-25595: Privilege escalation in n/a

> A malicious guest with passed-through PCI devices can crash the Xen hypervisor or potentially escalate privileges due to unsanitized register data.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 23 Sep 2020
- **Updated:** 4 Aug 2024
- **Also known as:** ALPINE-CVE-2020-25595, DEBIAN-CVE-2020-25595, GHSA-gx32-9whp-v6gp, UBUNTU-CVE-2020-25595

## What is CVE-2020-25595?

CVE-2020-25595 is a high-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 23 Sep 2020. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. The PCI passthrough code improperly uses register data. Code paths in Xen's MSI handling have been identified that act on unsanitized values read back from device hardware registers. While devices strictly compliant with PCI specifications shouldn't be able to affect these registers, experience shows that it's very common for devices to have out-of-spec "backdoor" operations that can affect the result of these reads. A not fully trusted guest may be able to crash Xen, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) for the entire system. Privilege escalation and information leaks cannot be excluded. All versions of Xen supporting PCI passthrough are affected. Only x86 systems are vulnerable. Arm systems are not vulnerable. Only guests with passed through PCI devices may be able to leverage the vulnerability. Only systems passing through devices with out-of-spec ("backdoor") functionality can cause issues. Experience shows that such out-of-spec functionality is common; unless you have reason to believe that your device does not have such functionality, it's better to assume that it does.

Weakness: CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2020-25595?

It affects 4 products.


Products: Debian Debian Linux, Fedoraproject Fedora, Opensuse Leap, Xen Xen.

## How do I fix CVE-2020-25595?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2020-25595 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-25595 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Debian Debian Linux

- [CVE-2015-3306](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-3306/): ProFTPD Improper Access Control (critical 10.0, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-49113](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-49113/): RoundCube Webmail Deserialization of Untrusted Data (critical 9.9, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-24061](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-24061/): GNU InetUtils Argument Injection (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-39682](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39682/): Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2024-9680](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-9680/): Mozilla Firefox Use-After-Free (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2020-25595 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2020-25595 is a high-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 23 Sep 2020. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-25595 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Debian Debian Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-25595/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-25595/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25595
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25595
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2020-25595

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-25595/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
