{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-5328 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2020-5328 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2020-5328 is a critical missing authorization vulnerability in Dell Isilon OneFS, published on 6 Mar 2020. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2020-5328 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2020-5328 is a critical missing authorization vulnerability in Dell Isilon OneFS, published on 6 Mar 2020. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2020-5328 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Dell Isilon OneFS. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-5328/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-5328/index.md)","id":"CVE-2020-5328","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-5328/index.md","name":"CVE-2020-5328","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-974p-hcqc-3w9p"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation","data_modify"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"Dell EMC Isilon OneFS","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can gain unauthorized control of the cluster if SyncIQ is licensed but encrypted syncs are not required.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"dell","cpe":[{"product":"emc_isilon_onefs","vendor":"dell"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-306","name":"Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality"}],"description":"Dell EMC Isilon OneFS versions prior to 8.2.0 contain an unauthorized access vulnerability due to a lack of thorough authorization checks when SyncIQ is licensed, but encrypted syncs are not marked as required. When this happens, loss of control of the cluster can occur.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Missing authorization in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-5328","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2020"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Open redirect in Avamar","id":"CVE-2020-5329"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Deserialization in Dell Encryption Enterprise","id":"CVE-2020-5327"},"products":["Isilon OneFS"],"published":"2020-03-06","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-5353","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-29"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Privilege escalation in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-5369","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-09-02"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site request forgery in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2018-1213","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-03-26"},{"cvss_score":8,"headline":"Misconfiguration in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-5371","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-07-06"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Auth bypass in Isilon OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-5318","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-06"},{"cvss_score":7,"headline":"Privilege escalation in PowerScale OneFS","id":"CVE-2020-26181","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-01-05"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-09-16","vendors":["Dell"]},"summary":"Attackers can gain unauthorized control of the cluster if SyncIQ is licensed but encrypted syncs are not required.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2020-5328/"}