{"answers":{"affected":"8 open source packages ship an affected version, including django and Django. It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-32052 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade django to a fixed version for your release line: 2.2.22, 3.1.10 or 3.2.2.","what":"CVE-2021-32052 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 6 May 2021. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2021-32052 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2021-32052 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 6 May 2021. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-32052 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- django (Bitnami): affected from 2.2.0; fixed in 2.2.22, 3.1.10, 3.2.2\n- django (PyPI): affected from 2.2; fixed in 2.2.22, 3.1.10, 3.2.2\n- django (PyPI): affected from 2.2; fixed in 2.2.22\n- django (PyPI): affected from 3.1; fixed in 3.1.10\n- django (PyPI): affected from 3.2; fixed in 3.2.2\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 2.2; fixed in 2.2.22\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 3.1; fixed in 3.1.10\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 3.2; fixed in 3.2.2\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-32052/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-32052/index.md)","id":"CVE-2021-32052","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-32052/index.md","name":"CVE-2021-32052","record":{"aliases":["BIT-django-2021-32052","DEBIAN-CVE-2021-32052","GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf","PYSEC-2021-8","UBUNTU-CVE-2021-32052"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"Django web framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Header injection possible in Django applications using URLValidator with newlines in HTTP responses, requiring specific application logic to exploit.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"other"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"django","vendor":"djangoproject"},{"product":"fedora","vendor":"fedoraproject"}],"cvss":{"score":6.1,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-79","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation"}],"description":"In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers.","ecosystems":["Bitnami","PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Header injection possible in Django","id":"CVE-2021-32052","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":"djangoproject:django","products":["djangoproject:django","fedoraproject:fedora"],"type":"other","year":"2021"},"n_packages":8,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in JPA Server in HAPI FHIR","id":"CVE-2021-32053"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["2.2.22","3.1.10","3.2.2"],"introduced":["2.2.0","3.1.0","3.2.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:bitnami/django","source":"BIT-django-2021-32052"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["2.2.22"],"introduced":["2.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["3.1.10"],"introduced":["3.1"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["3.2.2"],"introduced":["3.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["2.2.22","3.1.10","3.2.2"],"introduced":["2.2","3.1","3.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"PYSEC-2021-8"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["2.2.22"],"introduced":["2.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["3.1.10"],"introduced":["3.1"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["3.2.2"],"introduced":["3.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-qm57-vhq3-3fwf"}],"prev":{"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2021-32051"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2021-05-06","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin","id":"CVE-2026-4277","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection in HasKey(lhs, rhs) on Oracle","id":"CVE-2024-53908","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-42005","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django bypasses validation when using one form field to upload multiple files","id":"CVE-2023-31047","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-05-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django `Trunc()` and `Extract()` database functions vulnerable to SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2022-34265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL Injection in Django","id":"CVE-2021-35042","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-02"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Django","id":"CVE-2020-7471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-03","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Header injection possible in Django applications using URLValidator with newlines in HTTP responses, requiring specific application logic to exploit.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-32052/"}