{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-42017 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2021-42017 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2021-42017 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Siemens RUGGEDCOM M2100, published on 8 Mar 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2021-42017 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2021-42017 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Siemens RUGGEDCOM M2100, published on 8 Mar 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-42017 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Siemens RUGGEDCOM M2100. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-42017/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-42017/index.md)","id":"CVE-2021-42017","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-42017/index.md","name":"CVE-2021-42017","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-v2q7-x3pw-jc98"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Siemens RUGGEDCOM switch","requires_auth":"none","summary":"A POODLE attack variant allows attackers to decrypt sensitive data transmitted over vulnerable network switches.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"weak_cryptography"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"siemens","cpe":[{"product":"ruggedcom_ros","vendor":"siemens"}],"cvss":{"score":5.9,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-295","name":"Improper Certificate Validation"},{"id":"CWE-358","name":"Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard"}],"description":"A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2.\r\n\r\nIf an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Weak cryptography in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-42017","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"weak_cryptography","year":"2021"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Memory corruption in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-42018"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-42016"},"products":["RUGGEDCOM M2100","RUGGEDCOM M2100F","RUGGEDCOM M2200","RUGGEDCOM M2200F","RUGGEDCOM M969","RUGGEDCOM M969F","RUGGEDCOM RMC30","RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RP110","RUGGEDCOM RS1600","RUGGEDCOM RS1600F","RUGGEDCOM RS1600T","RUGGEDCOM RS400","RUGGEDCOM RS400F","RUGGEDCOM RS401","RUGGEDCOM RS416","RUGGEDCOM RS416F","RUGGEDCOM RS416P","RUGGEDCOM RS416PF","RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RS8000","RUGGEDCOM RS8000A","RUGGEDCOM RS8000H","RUGGEDCOM RS8000T","RUGGEDCOM RS900","RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RS900F","RUGGEDCOM RS900G","RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RS900GF","RUGGEDCOM RS900GP","RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF","RUGGEDCOM RS900L","RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01","RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX","RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01","RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX","RUGGEDCOM RS900W","RUGGEDCOM RS910","RUGGEDCOM RS910L","RUGGEDCOM RS910W","RUGGEDCOM RS920L","RUGGEDCOM RS920W","RUGGEDCOM RS930L","RUGGEDCOM RS930W","RUGGEDCOM RS940G","RUGGEDCOM RS940GF","RUGGEDCOM RS969","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF","RUGGEDCOM RSG2200","RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F","RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF","RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F","RUGGEDCOM RSG907R","RUGGEDCOM RSG908C","RUGGEDCOM RSG909R","RUGGEDCOM RSG910C","RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X","RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X","RUGGEDCOM RSL910","RUGGEDCOM RST2228","RUGGEDCOM RST2228P","RUGGEDCOM RST916C","RUGGEDCOM RST916P","RUGGEDCOM i800","RUGGEDCOM i801","RUGGEDCOM i802","RUGGEDCOM i803"],"published":"2022-03-08","related":[{"cvss_score":9.6,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-37208","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-03-08"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Other in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2023-24845","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-08"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Missing authorization in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2017-12736","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-12-26"},{"cvss_score":8,"headline":"Code injection in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2022-34663","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-12"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2023-39269","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-08"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Information disclosure in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-42016","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-03-08"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Other in RUGGEDCOM M2100","id":"CVE-2021-42020","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-03-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-08-12","vendors":["Siemens"]},"summary":"A POODLE attack variant allows attackers to decrypt sensitive data transmitted over vulnerable network switches.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-42017/"}