{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including solana_rbpf. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-46102 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade solana_rbpf to 0.2.17 or later.","what":"CVE-2021-46102 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 27 Jan 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2021-46102 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2021-46102 is a high-severity vulnerability in n/a, published on 27 Jan 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2021-46102 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- solana_rbpf (crates.io): affected from 0.2.14; fixed in 0.2.17\n- solana_rbpf (crates.io): affected from 0.2.14; fixed in 0.2.17\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-46102/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-46102/index.md)","id":"CVE-2021-46102","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-46102/index.md","name":"CVE-2021-46102","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service","code_execution"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Solana rBPF library","requires_auth":"none","summary":"An integer overflow in the Solana rBPF library allows attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute code via crafted ELF files.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"integer_overflow"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"rbpf","vendor":"solanalabs"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-190","name":"Integer Overflow or Wraparound"}],"description":"From version 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 for Solana rBPF, function \"relocate\" in the file src/elf.rs has an integer overflow bug because the sym.st_value is read directly from ELF file without checking. If the sym.st_value is rather large, an integer overflow is triggered while calculating the variable \"addr\" via \"addr = (sym.st_value + refd_pa) as u64\";","ecosystems":["crates.io"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Integer overflow in solana_rbpf","id":"CVE-2021-46102","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"crates.io","product":null,"products":[],"type":"integer_overflow","year":"2021"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Path traversal in n/a","id":"CVE-2021-46104"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":["0.2.17"],"introduced":["0.2.14"],"last_affected":[],"package":"solana_rbpf","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q"},{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":["0.2.17"],"introduced":["0.2.14"],"last_affected":[],"package":"solana_rbpf","purl":"pkg:cargo/solana_rbpf","source":"GHSA-xwqr-xmgg-j69q"}],"prev":{"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2021-46101"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2022-01-27","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Integer overflow in solana_rbpf","id":"CVE-2022-31264","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-21"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-04","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"An integer overflow in the Solana rBPF library allows attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute code via crafted ELF files.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2021-46102/"}