{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 7 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-1319 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2022-1319 is a high-severity vulnerability in Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager, published on 31 Aug 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2022-1319 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2022-1319 is a high-severity vulnerability in Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager, published on 31 Aug 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-1319 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1319/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1319/index.md)","id":"CVE-2022-1319","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1319/index.md","name":"CVE-2022-1319","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2022-1319","GHSA-5r46-q4x7-6fx6","UBUNTU-CVE-2022-1319"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Undertow web server","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Improper handling of AJP 400 responses in Undertow causes connection reuse failures, leading to denial of service.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"other"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"redhat","cpe":[{"product":"active_iq_unified_manager","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"cloud_secure_agent","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"oncommand_insight","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"oncommand_workflow_automation","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"openshift_application_runtimes","vendor":"redhat"},{"product":"single_sign-on","vendor":"redhat"},{"product":"undertow","vendor":"redhat"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-252","name":"Unchecked Return Value"}],"description":"A flaw was found in Undertow. For an AJP 400 response, EAP 7 is improperly sending two response packets, and those packets have the reuse flag set even though JBoss EAP closes the connection. A failure occurs when the connection is reused after a 400 by CPING since it reads in the second SEND_HEADERS response packet instead of a CPONG.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Other in undertow","id":"CVE-2022-1319","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"netapp:active_iq_unified_manager","products":["netapp:active_iq_unified_manager","netapp:cloud_secure_agent","netapp:oncommand_insight","netapp:oncommand_workflow_automation","redhat:single_sign-on"],"type":"other","year":"2022"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"Sliderby10Web \u003c 1.2.52 - Admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting","id":"CVE-2022-1320"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Hills ComNav Inadequate Encryption Strength","id":"CVE-2022-1318"},"products":["undertow"],"published":"2022-08-31","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Spring Security authorization rules can be bypassed via forward or include dispatcher types","id":"CVE-2022-31692","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-10-31"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Use after free in systemd-resolved","id":"CVE-2022-2526","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-09-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Authorization bypass in Spring Security","id":"CVE-2022-22978","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-19"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Code injection in Node","id":"CVE-2021-22931","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-08-16"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Code injection in Java","id":"CVE-2018-2938","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":8.3,"headline":"Code injection in Java","id":"CVE-2018-2941","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"},{"cvss_score":8.3,"headline":"Code injection in Java","id":"CVE-2018-2942","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-07-18"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-03","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Improper handling of AJP 400 responses in Undertow causes connection reuse failures, leading to denial of service.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1319/"}