{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including openssl-src. It affects 26 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-1343 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade openssl-src to 300.0.6 or later.","what":"CVE-2022-1343 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager, published on 3 May 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2022-1343 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2022-1343 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager, published on 3 May 2022. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-1343 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- openssl-src (crates.io): affected from 300.0.0; fixed in 300.0.6\n- openssl-src (crates.io): affected from 300.0.0; fixed in 300.0.6\n- openssl-src (crates.io): affected from 300.0.0; fixed in 300.0.6\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1343/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1343/index.md)","id":"CVE-2022-1343","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1343/index.md","name":"CVE-2022-1343","record":{"aliases":["ALPINE-CVE-2022-1343","CLEANSTART-2026-VF23025","GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7","RUSTSEC-2022-0027","UBUNTU-CVE-2022-1343"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"OpenSSL cryptographic library","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can bypass OCSP certificate verification checks when the non-default OCSP_NOCHECKS flag is enabled, leading to acceptance of invalid signatures.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"openssl","cpe":[{"product":"a250_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"a700s_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"active_iq_unified_manager","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"aff_500f_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"aff_8300_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"aff_8700_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"aff_a400_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"clustered_data_ontap","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"fas_500f_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"fas_8300_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"fas_8700_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h300e_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h300s_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h410s_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h500e_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h500s_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h700e_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"h700s_firmware","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"santricity_smi-s_provider","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"smi-s_provider","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"snapmanager","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"solidfire\\,_enterprise_sds_\\\u0026_hci_storage_node","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"solidfire_\\\u0026_hci_management_node","vendor":"netapp"},{"product":"openssl","vendor":"openssl"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-295","name":"Improper Certificate Validation"}],"description":"The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL \"ocsp\" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the \"-no_cert_checks\" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).","ecosystems":["crates.io"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate","id":"CVE-2022-1343","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"crates.io","product":"netapp:active_iq_unified_manager","products":["netapp:active_iq_unified_manager","netapp:clustered_data_ontap","netapp:h300e_firmware","netapp:h300s_firmware","netapp:h410s_firmware","netapp:h500e_firmware","netapp:h500s_firmware","netapp:h700e_firmware","netapp:h700s_firmware","netapp:snapmanager","netapp:solidfire_\\\u0026_hci_management_node","openssl:openssl"],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2022"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Stored XSS due to no sanitization in the filename in causefx/organizr","id":"CVE-2022-1344"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":["300.0.6"],"introduced":["300.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"openssl-src","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7"},{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":["300.0.6"],"introduced":["300.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"openssl-src","purl":"pkg:cargo/openssl-src","source":"GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7"},{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":["300.0.6"],"introduced":["300.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"openssl-src","purl":"pkg:cargo/openssl-src","source":"RUSTSEC-2022-0027"}],"prev":{"headline":"Information disclosure in Remote Desktop Manager","id":"CVE-2022-1342"},"products":["OpenSSL"],"published":"2022-05-03","related":[{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys","id":"CVE-2022-1473","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-03"},{"cvss_score":5.9,"headline":"Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite","id":"CVE-2022-1434","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0 1.0","name":"RustSec","prefix":"RUSTSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-10-14","vendors":["OpenSSL"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass OCSP certificate verification checks when the non-default OCSP_NOCHECKS flag is enabled, leading to acceptance of invalid signatures.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-1343/"}