{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-29056 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2022-29056 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2022-29056 is a low-severity denial of service vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail, published on 9 Mar 2023. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2022-29056 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2022-29056 is a low-severity denial of service vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail, published on 9 Mar 2023. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-29056 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Fortinet FortiMail. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-29056/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-29056/index.md)","id":"CVE-2022-29056","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-29056/index.md","name":"CVE-2022-29056","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-cvr2-h2fv-q36g"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Fortinet FortiMail","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote unauthenticated attackers can exhaust CPU and memory resources by sending numerous HTTP requests to the login form, causing denial of service.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"fortinet","cpe":[{"product":"fortimail","vendor":"fortinet"}],"cvss":{"score":3.5,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:X","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-307","name":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts"}],"description":"A improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability [CWE-307] in Fortinet FortiMail version 6.4.0, version 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 and before 6.0.9 allows  a remote unauthenticated attacker to partially exhaust CPU and memory via sending numerous HTTP requests to the login form.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":"2025-03-12","github_poc":1,"max_poc_stars":1,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2025-03-12T02:20:00Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/chessredoffsec/CVE-2022-29056","stars":1,"title":null}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Denial of service in FortiMail","id":"CVE-2022-29056","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2022"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiEDR","id":"CVE-2022-29057"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Null dereference in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy","id":"CVE-2022-29055"},"products":["FortiMail"],"published":"2023-03-09","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Fortinet FortiMail Path Traversal","id":"CVE-2026-104286","kev_date_added":"2026-10-01","published":"2026-10-01"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in Fortinet FortiMail","id":"CVE-2021-36166","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-03-01"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Fortinet FortiMail","id":"CVE-2021-24007","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in FortiMail","id":"CVE-2020-9294","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-04-27"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"Auth bypass in FortiMail","id":"CVE-2023-47539","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-03-18"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Path traversal in Fortinet FortiMail","id":"CVE-2021-24013","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-12"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Memory corruption in Fortinet FortiMail","id":"CVE-2021-22129","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-09"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0","name":"PoC-in-GitHub"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-10-22","vendors":["Fortinet"]},"summary":"Remote unauthenticated attackers can exhaust CPU and memory resources by sending numerous HTTP requests to the login form, causing denial of service.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-29056/"}