{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including oauthenticator. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-31027 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade oauthenticator to 15.0.0 or later.","what":"CVE-2022-31027 is a medium-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in jupyterhub oauthenticator, published on 6 Jun 2022. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2022-31027 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2022-31027 is a medium-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in jupyterhub oauthenticator, published on 6 Jun 2022. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-31027 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- oauthenticator (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 15.0.0\n- oauthenticator (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 15.0.0\n- oauthenticator (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 15.0.0\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-31027/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-31027/index.md)","id":"CVE-2022-31027","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-31027/index.md","name":"CVE-2022-31027","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-r7v4-jwx9-wx43","PYSEC-2022-206"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"JupyterHub OAuth library","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can bypass institutional access restrictions in JupyterHub by spoofing email domains via external OAuth providers like GitHub.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"auth_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"oauthenticator","vendor":"jupyter"}],"cvss":{"score":4.2,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-639","name":"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key"}],"description":"OAuthenticator is an OAuth token library for the JupyerHub login handler. CILogonOAuthenticator is provided by the OAuthenticator package, and lets users log in to a JupyterHub via CILogon. This is primarily used to restrict a JupyterHub only to users of a given institute. The allowed_idps configuration trait of CILogonOAuthenticator is documented to be a list of domains that indicate the institutions whose users are authorized to access this JupyterHub. This authorization is validated by ensuring that the *email* field provided to us by CILogon has a *domain* that matches one of the domains listed in `allowed_idps`.If `allowed_idps` contains `berkeley.edu`, you might expect only users with valid current credentials provided by University of California, Berkeley to be able to access the JupyterHub. However, CILogonOAuthenticator does *not* verify which provider is used by the user to login, only the email address provided. So a user can login with a GitHub account that has email set to `\u003csomething\u003e@berkeley.edu`, and that will be treated exactly the same as someone logging in using the UC Berkeley official Identity Provider. The patch fixing this issue makes a *breaking change* in how `allowed_idps` is interpreted. It's no longer a list of domains, but configuration representing the `EntityID` of the IdPs that are allowed, picked from the [list maintained by CILogon](https://cilogon.org/idplist/). Users are advised to upgrade.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key when using CILogonOAuthenticator in oauthenticator","id":"CVE-2022-31027","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"auth_bypass","year":"2022"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Possible DDOS by establishing keep-alive connections with anonymous HTTP clients in MinIO","id":"CVE-2022-31028"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["15.0.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"oauthenticator","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-r7v4-jwx9-wx43"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["15.0.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"oauthenticator","purl":"pkg:pypi/oauthenticator","source":"GHSA-r7v4-jwx9-wx43"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["15.0.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"oauthenticator","purl":"pkg:pypi/oauthenticator","source":"PYSEC-2022-206"}],"prev":{"headline":"Use of Uninitialized Variable in trilogy","id":"CVE-2022-31026"},"products":["oauthenticator"],"published":"2022-06-06","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"OAuthenticator: Authentication Bypass in Auth0OAuthenticator via Unverified Email Claims","id":"CVE-2026-33175","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-03"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"JupyterHub OAuthenticator elevation of privilege","id":"CVE-2018-7206","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-02-18"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"GoogleOAuthenticator.hosted_domain incorrectly verifies membership of an Google organization/workspace","id":"CVE-2024-29033","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-03-20"},{"cvss_score":6.3,"headline":"Base class whitelist configuration ignored in OAuthenticator","id":"CVE-2020-26250","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-12-01"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-04-23","vendors":["jupyterhub"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass institutional access restrictions in JupyterHub by spoofing email domains via external OAuth providers like GitHub.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-31027/"}