{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 2 products.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-39950 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2022-39950 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2022-39950 is a high-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in Fortinet Fortianalyzer, published on 2 Nov 2022. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2022-39950 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2022-39950 is a high-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in Fortinet Fortianalyzer, published on 2 Nov 2022. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-39950 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-39950/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-39950/index.md)","id":"CVE-2022-39950","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-39950/index.md","name":"CVE-2022-39950","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-vghm-mjgx-gf75"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Fortinet network management","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"A low-privilege attacker can execute cross-site scripting attacks in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer by posting crafted comments in report templates.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"xss"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"fortinet","cpe":[{"product":"fortianalyzer","vendor":"fortinet"},{"product":"fortimanager","vendor":"fortinet"}],"cvss":{"score":8,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:U/RC:C","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-79","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation"}],"description":"An improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] exists in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer 6.0.0 all versions, 6.2.0 all versions, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4. Report templates may allow a low privilege level attacker to perform an XSS attack via posting a crafted CKeditor \"protected\" comment as described in CVE-2020-9281.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager","id":"CVE-2022-39950","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"fortinet:fortianalyzer","products":["fortinet:fortianalyzer","fortinet:fortimanager"],"type":"xss","year":"2022"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Command injection in FortiWeb","id":"CVE-2022-39951"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Security feature bypass in Fortinet FortiEDR","id":"CVE-2022-39949"},"products":["Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager"],"published":"2022-11-02","related":[{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"Fortinet Multiple Products Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel","id":"CVE-2026-24858","kev_date_added":"2026-01-27","published":"2026-01-27"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"Memory corruption in FortiAnalyzer","id":"CVE-2023-25610","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-03-24"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Server-side request forgery in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager","id":"CVE-2021-32603","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-08-05"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer","id":"CVE-2020-12817","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-09-24"},{"cvss_score":8,"headline":"Auth bypass in FortiOS","id":"CVE-2024-48886","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-01-14"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Command injection in Fortinet FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiPortal","id":"CVE-2021-26104","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-04-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-10-25","vendors":["Fortinet"]},"summary":"A low-privilege attacker can execute cross-site scripting attacks in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer by posting crafted comments in report templates.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-39950/"}