CVE-2022-49744 mm/uffd: fix pte marker when fork() without fork event

Medium 5.5 Published Updated

A flaw in the Linux kernel's userfaultfd implementation allows corrupted page reads or crashes during fork operations, potentially leading to denial of service or information disclosure.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2022-49744?

CVE-2022-49744 is a medium-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Mar 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/uffd: fix pte marker when fork() without fork event

Patch series "mm: Fixes on pte markers".

Patch 1 resolves the syzkiller report from Pengfei.

Patch 2 further harden pte markers when used with the recent swapin error markers. The major case is we should persist a swapin error marker after fork(), so child shouldn't read a corrupted page.

This patch (of 2):

When fork(), dst_vma is not guaranteed to have VM_UFFD_WP even if src may have it and has pte marker installed. The warning is improper along with the comment. The right thing is to inherit the pte marker when needed, or keep the dst pte empty.

A vague guess is this happened by an accident when there's the prior patch to introduce src/dst vma into this helper during the uffd-wp feature got developed and I probably messed up in the rebase, since if we replace dst_vma with src_vma the warning & comment it all makes sense too.

Hugetlb did exactly the right here (copy_hugetlb_page_range()). Fix the general path.

Reproducer:

https://github.com/xupengfe/syzkaller_logs/blob/main/221208_115556_copy_page_range/repro.c

Bugzilla report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216808

Which versions are affected by CVE-2022-49744?

It affects 1 product.

Products include Linux kernel.

How do I fix CVE-2022-49744?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade to the fixed version. Memory-safe languages, compiler hardening and fuzzing prevent most new cases. More about Memory corruption.

Is CVE-2022-49744 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2022-49744 in the wild and no public exploit code.

All Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Sources

Also known as DEBIAN-CVE-2022-49744, GHSA-crf3-p565-96vh, UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49744.

Is CVE-2022-49744 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free