# CVE-2023-53031: powerpc/imc-pmu: Fix use of mutex in IRQs disabled section

> A race condition in the Linux kernel's powerpc IMC PMU driver causes a kernel warning and potential crash when using mutexes in IRQ-disabled sections.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 27 Mar 2025
- **Updated:** 11 May 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2023-53031, DEBIAN-CVE-2023-53031, GHSA-jph2-wv5j-5w33, UBUNTU-CVE-2023-53031

## What is CVE-2023-53031?

CVE-2023-53031 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Mar 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

powerpc/imc-pmu: Fix use of mutex in IRQs disabled section

Current imc-pmu code triggers a WARNING with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled, while running a thread_imc event.

Command to trigger the warning:
  # perf stat -e thread_imc/CPM_CS_FROM_L4_MEM_X_DPTEG/ sleep 5

   Performance counter stats for 'sleep 5':

                   0      thread_imc/CPM_CS_FROM_L4_MEM_X_DPTEG/

         5.002117947 seconds time elapsed

         0.000131000 seconds user
         0.001063000 seconds sys

Below is snippet of the warning in dmesg:

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 2869, name: perf-exec
  preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
  4 locks held by perf-exec/2869:
   #0: c00000004325c540 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: bprm_execve+0x64/0xa90
   #1: c00000004325c5d8 (&sig->exec_update_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: begin_new_exec+0x460/0xef0
   #2: c0000003fa99d4e0 (&cpuctx_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: perf_event_exec+0x290/0x510
   #3: c000000017ab8418 (&ctx->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: perf_event_exec+0x29c/0x510
  irq event stamp: 4806
  hardirqs last  enabled at (4805): [<c000000000f65b94>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x94/0xd0
  hardirqs last disabled at (4806): [<c0000000003fae44>] perf_event_exec+0x394/0x510
  softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<c00000000013c404>] copy_process+0xc34/0x1ff0
  softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
  CPU: 36 PID: 2869 Comm: perf-exec Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2 #61
  Hardware name: 8375-42A POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:v7.0-16-g9b85f7d961 PowerNV
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xe0 (unreliable)
    __might_resched+0x2f8/0x310
    __mutex_lock+0x6c/0x13f0
    thread_imc_event_add+0xf4/0x1b0
    event_sched_in+0xe0/0x210
    merge_sched_in+0x1f0/0x600
    visit_groups_merge.isra.92.constprop.166+0x2bc/0x6c0
    ctx_flexible_sched_in+0xcc/0x140
    ctx_sched_in+0x20c/0x2a0
    ctx_resched+0x104/0x1c0
    perf_event_exec+0x340/0x510
    begin_new_exec+0x730/0xef0
    load_elf_binary+0x3f8/0x1e10
  ...
  do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2001 set at [<00000000fd63e7cf>] do_nanosleep+0x60/0x1a0
  WARNING: CPU: 36 PID: 2869 at kernel/sched/core.c:9912 __might_sleep+0x9c/0xb0
  CPU: 36 PID: 2869 Comm: sleep Tainted: G        W          6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2 #61
  Hardware name: 8375-42A POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:v7.0-16-g9b85f7d961 PowerNV
  NIP:  c000000000194a1c LR: c000000000194a18 CTR: c000000000a78670
  REGS: c00000004d2134e0 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W           (6.2.0-rc2-00011-g1247637727f2)
  MSR:  9000000000021033 <SF,HV,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 48002824  XER: 00000000
  CFAR: c00000000013fb64 IRQMASK: 1

The above warning triggered because the current imc-pmu code uses mutex
lock in interrupt disabled sections. The function mutex_lock()
internally calls __might_resched(), which will check if IRQs are
disabled and in case IRQs are disabled, it will trigger the warning.

Fix the issue by changing the mutex lock to spinlock.

[mpe: Fix comments, trim oops in change log, add reported-by tags]

Weakness: CWE-667 (Improper Locking)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2023-53031?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2023-53031?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2023-53031 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2023-53031 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2023-53031 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2023-53031 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Mar 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2023-53031 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-53031/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-53031/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53031
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-53031

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-53031/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
