# CVE-2023-54134: autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode > A local attacker can trigger a memory leak in the Linux kernel autofs module via ioctl, leading to resource exhaustion and denial of service. - **Severity:** Not scored - **Exploited in the wild:** Not known - **Login needed:** Any signed-in user - **Attackable:** Local or same network only - **Victim action needed:** Not needed - **Fix available:** Yes - **Published:** 24 Dec 2025 - **Updated:** 11 May 2026 - **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2023-54134, DEBIAN-CVE-2023-54134, GHSA-8c3j-jg6j-52j2, UBUNTU-CVE-2023-54134 ## What is CVE-2023-54134? CVE-2023-54134 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 24 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim. ### Official description In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: autofs: fix memory leak of waitqueues in autofs_catatonic_mode Syzkaller reports a memory leak: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810b279e00 (size 96): comm "syz-executor399", pid 3631, jiffies 4294964921 (age 23.870s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff ..........'..... 08 9e 27 0b 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..'............. backtrace: [] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [] autofs_wait+0x3fa/0x9a0 fs/autofs/waitq.c:378 [] autofs_do_expire_multi+0xa7/0x3e0 fs/autofs/expire.c:593 [] autofs_expire_multi+0x53/0x80 fs/autofs/expire.c:619 [] autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked+0x322/0x3b0 fs/autofs/root.c:897 [] autofs_root_ioctl+0x25/0x30 fs/autofs/root.c:910 [] vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] [] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] [] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] [] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856 [] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd autofs_wait_queue structs should be freed if their wait_ctr becomes zero. Otherwise they will be lost. In this case an AUTOFS_IOC_EXPIRE_MULTI ioctl is done, then a new waitqueue struct is allocated in autofs_wait(), its initial wait_ctr equals 2. After that wait_event_killable() is interrupted (it returns -ERESTARTSYS), so that 'wq->name.name == NULL' condition may be not satisfied. Actually, this condition can be satisfied when autofs_wait_release() or autofs_catatonic_mode() is called and, what is also important, wait_ctr is decremented in those places. Upon the exit of autofs_wait(), wait_ctr is decremented to 1. Then the unmounting process begins: kill_sb calls autofs_catatonic_mode(), which should have freed the waitqueues, but it only decrements its usage counter to zero which is not a correct behaviour. edit:imk This description is of course not correct. The umount performed as a result of an expire is a umount of a mount that has been automounted, it's not the autofs mount itself. They happen independently, usually after everything mounted within the autofs file system has been expired away. If everything hasn't been expired away the automount daemon can still exit leaving mounts in place. But expires done in both cases will result in a notification that calls autofs_wait_release() with a result status. The problem case is the summary execution of of the automount daemon. In this case any waiting processes won't be woken up until either they are terminated or the mount is umounted. end edit: imk So in catatonic mode we should free waitqueues which counter becomes zero. edit: imk Initially I was concerned that the calling of autofs_wait_release() and autofs_catatonic_mode() was not mutually exclusive but that can't be the case (obviously) because the queue entry (or entries) is removed from the list when either of these two functions are called. Consequently the wait entry will be freed by only one of these functions or by the woken process in autofs_wait() depending on the order of the calls. end edit: imk ## Which versions are affected by CVE-2023-54134? ## How do I fix CVE-2023-54134? Apply the vendor's patch. ## Is CVE-2023-54134 being exploited? There is no known exploitation of CVE-2023-54134 in the wild and no public exploit code. ## Fix prompt for AI coding agents ```text Check this codebase for CVE-2023-54134 and fix it if it is affected. What it is: CVE-2023-54134 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 24 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim. Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2023-54134 in the wild and no public exploit code. Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page. Task: 1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies. 2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it. 3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead. 4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why. 5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing. Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-54134/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-54134/index.md) ``` ## Sources - CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54134 - NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-54134 - OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2023-54134 --- From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2023-54134/ Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.