{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/hashicorp/boundary. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-1052 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade github.com/hashicorp/boundary to 0.15.0 or later.","what":"CVE-2024-1052 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in HashiCorp Boundary, published on 5 Feb 2024. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2024-1052 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2024-1052 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in HashiCorp Boundary, published on 5 Feb 2024. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-1052 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- github.com/hashicorp/boundary (Go): affected from 0.8.0; fixed in 0.15.0\n- github.com/hashicorp/boundary (Go): affected from 0.8.0; fixed in 0.15.0\n- github.com/hashicorp/boundary (Go): affected from 0.8.0; fixed in 0.15.0\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-1052/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-1052/index.md)","id":"CVE-2024-1052","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-1052/index.md","name":"CVE-2024-1052","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-vh73-q3rw-qx7w","GO-2024-2532"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["account_takeover","data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"HashiCorp Boundary","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers with specific privileges can hijack active sessions by tampering with TLS certificates, gaining unauthorized access to underlying services.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"auth_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"HashiCorp","cpe":[{"product":"boundary","vendor":"hashicorp"}],"cvss":{"score":8,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-295","name":"Improper Certificate Validation"}],"description":"Boundary and Boundary Enterprise (“Boundary”) is vulnerable to session hijacking through TLS certificate tampering. An attacker with privileges to enumerate active or pending sessions, obtain a private key pertaining to a session, and obtain a valid trust on first use (TOFU) token may craft a TLS certificate to hijack an active session and gain access to the underlying service or application.","ecosystems":["Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Boundary Vulnerable to Session Hijacking Through TLS Certificate Tampering","id":"CVE-2024-1052","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Go","product":null,"products":[],"type":"auth_bypass","year":"2024"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Event Tickets and Registration \u003c= 5.8.1 - Missing Authorization","id":"CVE-2024-1053"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.15.0"],"introduced":["0.8.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/hashicorp/boundary","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-vh73-q3rw-qx7w"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.15.0"],"introduced":["0.8.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/hashicorp/boundary","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/hashicorp/boundary","source":"GHSA-vh73-q3rw-qx7w"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.15.0"],"introduced":["0.8.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/hashicorp/boundary","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/hashicorp/boundary","source":"GO-2024-2532"}],"prev":{"headline":"List category posts \u003c= 0.89.6 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting","id":"CVE-2024-1051"},"products":["Boundary","Boundary Enterprise"],"published":"2024-02-05","related":[{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2022-36130","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-09-01"},{"cvss_score":6.1,"headline":"Hashicorp Boundary vulnerable to clickjacking","id":"CVE-2022-36182","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-10-27"},{"cvss_score":5.9,"headline":"Boundary Controller Incorrectly Handles HTTP Requests On Initialization Which May Lead to a Denial of Service","id":"CVE-2024-12289","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-12"},{"cvss_score":5,"headline":"Boundary Workers Store Rotated Credentials in Plaintext Even When a Key Management Service Configured","id":"CVE-2023-0690","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-02-08"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-01","vendors":["HashiCorp"]},"summary":"Attackers with specific privileges can hijack active sessions by tampering with TLS certificates, gaining unauthorized access to underlying services.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-1052/"}