{"answers":{"affected":"4 open source packages ship an affected version, including mobsfscan and mobsf. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2024-29190 exists.","fix":"Upgrade mobsfscan to 0.3.8 or later.","what":"CVE-2024-29190 is a high-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF, published on 22 Mar 2024. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2024-29190 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2024-29190 is a high-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF, published on 22 Mar 2024. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2024-29190 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- mobsfscan (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 0.3.8\n- mobsfscan (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 0.3.8\n- mobsfscan (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 0.3.8\n- mobsf (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 3.9.7\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-29190/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-29190/index.md)","id":"CVE-2024-29190","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-29190/index.md","name":"CVE-2024-29190","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-wfgj-wrgh-h3r3","PYSEC-2024-257","PYSEC-2026-1677"],"analysis":{"component_type":"developer_tool","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"MobSF security framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"An attacker can exploit missing input validation in MobSF to perform server-side request forgery, accessing internal services within the organization's infrastructure.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"mobile_security_framework","vendor":"opensecurity"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In version 3.9.5 Beta and prior, MobSF does not perform any input validation when extracting the hostnames in `android:host`, so requests can also be sent to local hostnames. This can lead to server-side request forgery. An attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization's infrastructure. Commit 5a8eeee73c5f504a6c3abdf2a139a13804efdb77 has a hotfix for this issue.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"MobSF SSRF Vulnerability on assetlinks_check(act_name, well_knowns)","id":"CVE-2024-29190","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"ssrf","year":"2024"},"n_packages":4,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"GHSL-2023-205 gotortc DOM-based Cross-site Scripting vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-29191"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["3.9.7"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsf","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsf","source":"PYSEC-2024-257"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.3.8"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsfscan","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-wfgj-wrgh-h3r3"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.3.8"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsfscan","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsfscan","source":"GHSA-wfgj-wrgh-h3r3"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.3.8"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsfscan","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsfscan","source":"PYSEC-2026-1677"}],"prev":{"headline":"ansys-geometry-core OS Command Injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-29189"},"products":["Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"],"published":"2024-03-22","related":[{"cvss_score":8.6,"headline":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Allows Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via malicious SVG Icon Upload","id":"CVE-2025-46335","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-05-05"},{"cvss_score":8.5,"headline":"Local Privilege Escalation in MobSF","id":"CVE-2025-24805","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-02-05"},{"cvss_score":8.4,"headline":"Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in MobSF","id":"CVE-2025-24803","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-02-05"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"MobSF has Stored XSS via Manifest Analysis - Dialer Code Host Field","id":"CVE-2026-24490","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-01-27"},{"cvss_score":8.1,"headline":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability in \"Diff or Compare\" Functionality","id":"CVE-2024-53999","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-03"},{"cvss_score":8,"headline":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) has a Zip Slip Vulnerability in .a Static Library Files","id":"CVE-2024-43399","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-19"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) bypass of SSRF fix","id":"CVE-2024-54000","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-04-10","vendors":["MobSF"]},"summary":"An attacker can exploit missing input validation in MobSF to perform server-side request forgery, accessing internal services within the organization's infrastructure.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-29190/"}