{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/zitadel/zitadel. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-32868 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade github.com/zitadel/zitadel to 2.50.0 or later.","what":"CVE-2024-32868 is a medium-severity vulnerability in zitadel, published on 25 Apr 2024. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2024-32868 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2024-32868 is a medium-severity vulnerability in zitadel, published on 25 Apr 2024. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-32868 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- github.com/zitadel/zitadel (Go): affected all versions; no fix listed\n- github.com/zitadel/zitadel (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 2.50.0\n- github.com/zitadel/zitadel (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 2.50.0\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-32868/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-32868/index.md)","id":"CVE-2024-32868","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-32868/index.md","name":"CVE-2024-32868","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-7j7j-66cv-m239","GO-2024-2788"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass","account_takeover"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Identity and Access Management","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can bypass Multi-Factor Authentication in ZITADEL due to missing lockout mechanisms for OTP checks, potentially leading to account takeover.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"zitadel","vendor":"zitadel"}],"cvss":{"score":6.5,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-307","name":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts"},{"id":"CWE-297","name":"Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch"}],"description":"ZITADEL provides users the possibility to use Time-based One-Time-Password (TOTP) and One-Time-Password (OTP) through SMS and Email. While ZITADEL already gives administrators the option to define a `Lockout Policy` with a maximum amount of failed password check attempts, there was no such mechanism for (T)OTP checks. This issue has been patched in version 2.50.0.","ecosystems":["Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":"2026-10-21","github_poc":1,"max_poc_stars":0,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2026-10-21T19:58:56Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/taiwoonileowo16-creator/CVE-2024-32868-Assignment-1","stars":0,"title":null}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"ZITADEL's Improper Lockout Mechanism Leads to MFA Bypass","id":"CVE-2024-32868","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Go","product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2024"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"Hono vulnerable to Restricted Directory Traversal in serveStatic with deno","id":"CVE-2024-32869"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/zitadel/zitadel","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/zitadel/zitadel","source":"GO-2024-2788"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["2.50.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/zitadel/zitadel","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-7j7j-66cv-m239"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["2.50.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/zitadel/zitadel","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/zitadel/zitadel","source":"GHSA-7j7j-66cv-m239"}],"prev":{"headline":"Suricata's defrag contains various issues leading to policy bypass","id":"CVE-2024-32867"},"products":["zitadel"],"published":"2024-04-25","related":[{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"ZITADEL: 1-Click Account Takeover via XSS in /saml-post Endpoint","id":"CVE-2026-29191","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-07"},{"cvss_score":9.3,"headline":"ZITADEL Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read SSRF via V2 Login","id":"CVE-2025-67494","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-09"},{"cvss_score":9,"headline":"IDOR Vulnerabilities in ZITADEL's Admin API that Primarily Impact LDAP Configurations","id":"CVE-2025-27507","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-03-04"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"Zitadel Bypass Second Authentication Factor","id":"CVE-2025-64103","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-10-29"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"Zitadel Expired JWT Keys Usable for Authorization Grants","id":"CVE-2025-31123","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-03-31"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"ZITADEL Improper Content-Type Validation Leads to Account Takeover via Stored XSS + CSP Bypass","id":"CVE-2024-29891","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-03-27"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"XSS with User Avatar image in ZITADEL","id":"CVE-2023-46238","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-10-26"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0","name":"PoC-in-GitHub"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2024-08-05","vendors":["zitadel"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass Multi-Factor Authentication in ZITADEL due to missing lockout mechanisms for OTP checks, potentially leading to account takeover.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-32868/"}