{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-36003 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2024-36003 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 20 May 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2024-36003 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2024-36003 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 20 May 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-36003 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-36003/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-36003/index.md)","id":"CVE-2024-36003","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-36003/index.md","name":"CVE-2024-36003","record":{"aliases":["BELL-CVE-2024-36003","DEBIAN-CVE-2024-36003","GHSA-4qcc-96j2-gv42","ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2024-36003","UBUNTU-CVE-2024-36003"],"analysis":{"component_type":"kernel","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Linux kernel driver","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"A locking dependency error in the Intel ice network driver can cause a deadlock, leading to a denial of service.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"race_condition"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"Linux","cpe":[{"product":"linux_kernel","vendor":"linux"}],"cvss":{"score":5.5,"severity":"medium","source":"nvd","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-667","name":"Improper Locking"}],"description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nice: fix LAG and VF lock dependency in ice_reset_vf()\n\n9f74a3dfcf83 (\"ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed over\naggregate\"), the ice driver has acquired the LAG mutex in ice_reset_vf().\nThe commit placed this lock acquisition just prior to the acquisition of\nthe VF configuration lock.\n\nIf ice_reset_vf() acquires the configuration lock via the ICE_VF_RESET_LOCK\nflag, this could deadlock with ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg() because it always\nacquires the locks in the order of the VF configuration lock and then the\nLAG mutex.\n\nLockdep reports this violation almost immediately on creating and then\nremoving 2 VF:\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.8.0-rc6 #54 Tainted: G        W  O\n------------------------------------------------------\nkworker/60:3/6771 is trying to acquire lock:\nff40d43e099380a0 (\u0026vf-\u003ecfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nff40d43ea1961210 (\u0026pf-\u003elag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice]\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-\u003e #1 (\u0026pf-\u003elag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40\n       lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0\n       __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0\n       ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg+0x45/0x690 [ice]\n       ice_vc_process_vf_msg+0x4f5/0x870 [ice]\n       __ice_clean_ctrlq+0x2b5/0x600 [ice]\n       ice_service_task+0x2c9/0x480 [ice]\n       process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0\n       worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0\n       kthread+0x104/0x140\n       ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n\n-\u003e #0 (\u0026vf-\u003ecfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50\n       validate_chain+0x558/0x800\n       __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40\n       lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0\n       __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0\n       ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n       ice_process_vflr_event+0x98/0xd0 [ice]\n       ice_service_task+0x1cc/0x480 [ice]\n       process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0\n       worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0\n       kthread+0x104/0x140\n       ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n       CPU0                    CPU1\n       ----                    ----\n  lock(\u0026pf-\u003elag_mutex);\n                               lock(\u0026vf-\u003ecfg_lock);\n                               lock(\u0026pf-\u003elag_mutex);\n  lock(\u0026vf-\u003ecfg_lock);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n4 locks held by kworker/60:3/6771:\n #0: ff40d43e05428b38 ((wq_completion)ice){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0\n #1: ff50d06e05197e58 ((work_completion)(\u0026pf-\u003eserv_task)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0\n #2: ff40d43ea1960e50 (\u0026pf-\u003evfs.table_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_process_vflr_event+0x48/0xd0 [ice]\n #3: ff40d43ea1961210 (\u0026pf-\u003elag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice]\n\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 60 PID: 6771 Comm: kworker/60:3 Tainted: G        W  O       6.8.0-rc6 #54\nHardware name:\nWorkqueue: ice ice_service_task [ice]\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80\n check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150\n check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50\n ? save_trace+0x59/0x230\n ? add_chain_cache+0x109/0x450\n validate_chain+0x558/0x800\n __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40\n ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100\n lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0\n ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n ? lock_is_held_type+0xc7/0x120\n __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0\n ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x50\n ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice]\n ? process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0\n ice_process_vflr_event+0x98/0xd0 [ice]\n ice_service_task+0x1cc/0x480 [ice]\n process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0\n worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x104/0x140\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nTo avoid deadlock, we must acquire the LAG \n---truncated---","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"ice: fix LAG and VF lock dependency in ice_reset_vf()","id":"CVE-2024-36003","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"linux:linux_kernel","products":["linux:linux_kernel"],"type":"race_condition","year":"2024"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"i40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue","id":"CVE-2024-36004"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"dpll: fix dpll_pin_on_pin_register() for multiple parent pins","id":"CVE-2024-36002"},"products":["Linux"],"published":"2024-05-20","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write","id":"CVE-2026-53266","kev_date_added":"2026-09-18","published":"2026-06-25"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation","id":"CVE-2013-6282","kev_date_added":"2022-09-15","published":"2013-11-19"},{"cvss_score":8.4,"headline":"Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow","id":"CVE-2022-0185","kev_date_added":"2024-08-21","published":"2022-02-11"},{"cvss_score":8.4,"headline":"Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation","id":"CVE-2013-2094","kev_date_added":"2022-09-15","published":"2013-05-14"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Linux Kernel Unspecified","id":"CVE-2026-53362","kev_date_added":"2026-08-27","published":"2026-07-04"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Linux Kernel Missing Initialization of a Variable","id":"CVE-2026-46300","kev_date_added":"2026-10-28","published":"2026-05-23"},{"cvss_score":7.8,"headline":"Linux Kernel Race Condition","id":"CVE-2025-39964","kev_date_added":"2026-09-18","published":"2025-10-13"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-05-23","vendors":["Linux"]},"summary":"A locking dependency error in the Intel ice network driver can cause a deadlock, leading to a denial of service.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-36003/"}