# CVE-2024-50226: cxl/port: Fix use-after-free, permit out-of-order decoder shutdown

> A use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel CXL subsystem allows attackers to cause a system crash or potentially execute arbitrary code.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 9 Nov 2024
- **Updated:** 11 May 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2024-50226, DEBIAN-CVE-2024-50226, GHSA-2742-r3c2-2qgj, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2024-50226, UBUNTU-CVE-2024-50226

## What is CVE-2024-50226?

CVE-2024-50226 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 9 Nov 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

cxl/port: Fix use-after-free, permit out-of-order decoder shutdown

In support of investigating an initialization failure report [1],
cxl_test was updated to register mock memory-devices after the mock
root-port/bus device had been registered. That led to cxl_test crashing
with a use-after-free bug with the following signature:

    cxl_port_attach_region: cxl region3: cxl_host_bridge.0:port3 decoder3.0 add: mem0:decoder7.0 @ 0 next: cxl_switch_uport.0 nr_eps: 1 nr_targets: 1
    cxl_port_attach_region: cxl region3: cxl_host_bridge.0:port3 decoder3.0 add: mem4:decoder14.0 @ 1 next: cxl_switch_uport.0 nr_eps: 2 nr_targets: 1
    cxl_port_setup_targets: cxl region3: cxl_switch_uport.0:port6 target[0] = cxl_switch_dport.0 for mem0:decoder7.0 @ 0
1)  cxl_port_setup_targets: cxl region3: cxl_switch_uport.0:port6 target[1] = cxl_switch_dport.4 for mem4:decoder14.0 @ 1
    [..]
    cxld_unregister: cxl decoder14.0:
    cxl_region_decode_reset: cxl_region region3:
    mock_decoder_reset: cxl_port port3: decoder3.0 reset
2)  mock_decoder_reset: cxl_port port3: decoder3.0: out of order reset, expected decoder3.1
    cxl_endpoint_decoder_release: cxl decoder14.0:
    [..]
    cxld_unregister: cxl decoder7.0:
3)  cxl_region_decode_reset: cxl_region region3:
    Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6bc3: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
    [..]
    RIP: 0010:to_cxl_port+0x8/0x60 [cxl_core]
    [..]
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     cxl_region_decode_reset+0x69/0x190 [cxl_core]
     cxl_region_detach+0xe8/0x210 [cxl_core]
     cxl_decoder_kill_region+0x27/0x40 [cxl_core]
     cxld_unregister+0x5d/0x60 [cxl_core]

At 1) a region has been established with 2 endpoint decoders (7.0 and
14.0). Those endpoints share a common switch-decoder in the topology
(3.0). At teardown, 2), decoder14.0 is the first to be removed and hits
the "out of order reset case" in the switch decoder. The effect though
is that region3 cleanup is aborted leaving it in-tact and
referencing decoder14.0. At 3) the second attempt to teardown region3
trips over the stale decoder14.0 object which has long since been
deleted.

The fix here is to recognize that the CXL specification places no
mandate on in-order shutdown of switch-decoders, the driver enforces
in-order allocation, and hardware enforces in-order commit. So, rather
than fail and leave objects dangling, always remove them.

In support of making cxl_region_decode_reset() always succeed,
cxl_region_invalidate_memregion() failures are turned into warnings.
Crashing the kernel is ok there since system integrity is at risk if
caches cannot be managed around physical address mutation events like
CXL region destruction.

A new device_for_each_child_reverse_from() is added to cleanup
port->commit_end after all dependent decoders have been disabled. In
other words if decoders are allocated 0->1->2 and disabled 1->2->0 then
port->commit_end only decrements from 2 after 2 has been disabled, and
it decrements all the way to zero since 1 was disabled previously.

Weakness: CWE-416 (Use After Free)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2024-50226?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2024-50226?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2024-50226 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-50226 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2024-50226 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2024-50226 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 9 Nov 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-50226 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-50226/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-50226/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50226
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50226
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2024-50226

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-50226/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
