# CVE-2024-53237: Bluetooth: fix use-after-free in device_for_each_child()

> A use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel Bluetooth subsystem allows local attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code or escalate privileges.

- **Severity:** High 8.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 27 Dec 2024
- **Updated:** 5 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-55552, AZL-55620, BELL-CVE-2024-53237, DEBIAN-CVE-2024-53237, GHSA-hrqf-4crg-qqjg, UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53237

## What is CVE-2024-53237?

CVE-2024-53237 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Dec 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: fix use-after-free in device_for_each_child()

Syzbot has reported the following KASAN splat:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in device_for_each_child+0x18f/0x1a0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88801f605308 by task kbnepd bnep0/4980

CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4980 Comm: kbnepd bnep0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-00161-gae90f6a6170d #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190
 ? device_for_each_child+0x18f/0x1a0
 print_report+0x13a/0x4cb
 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x5e/0x590
 ? __phys_addr+0xc6/0x150
 ? device_for_each_child+0x18f/0x1a0
 kasan_report+0xda/0x110
 ? device_for_each_child+0x18f/0x1a0
 ? __pfx_dev_memalloc_noio+0x10/0x10
 device_for_each_child+0x18f/0x1a0
 ? __pfx_device_for_each_child+0x10/0x10
 pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio+0xf2/0x180
 netdev_unregister_kobject+0x1ed/0x270
 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x123c/0x1d80
 ? __mutex_trylock_common+0xde/0x250
 ? __pfx_unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x10/0x10
 ? trace_contention_end+0xe6/0x140
 ? __mutex_lock+0x4e7/0x8f0
 ? __pfx_lock_acquire.part.0+0x10/0x10
 ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0
 ? unregister_netdev+0x12/0x30
 unregister_netdevice_queue+0x30d/0x3f0
 ? __pfx_unregister_netdevice_queue+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10
 unregister_netdev+0x1c/0x30
 bnep_session+0x1fb3/0x2ab0
 ? __pfx_bnep_session+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_woken_wake_function+0x10/0x10
 ? __kthread_parkme+0x132/0x200
 ? __pfx_bnep_session+0x10/0x10
 ? kthread+0x13a/0x370
 ? __pfx_bnep_session+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0x2b7/0x370
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x48/0x80
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
 </TASK>

Allocated by task 4974:
 kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0
 __kmalloc_noprof+0x1d1/0x440
 hci_alloc_dev_priv+0x1d/0x2820
 __vhci_create_device+0xef/0x7d0
 vhci_write+0x2c7/0x480
 vfs_write+0x6a0/0xfc0
 ksys_write+0x12f/0x260
 do_syscall_64+0xc7/0x250
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Freed by task 4979:
 kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
 __kasan_slab_free+0x4f/0x70
 kfree+0x141/0x490
 hci_release_dev+0x4d9/0x600
 bt_host_release+0x6a/0xb0
 device_release+0xa4/0x240
 kobject_put+0x1ec/0x5a0
 put_device+0x1f/0x30
 vhci_release+0x81/0xf0
 __fput+0x3f6/0xb30
 task_work_run+0x151/0x250
 do_exit+0xa79/0x2c30
 do_group_exit+0xd5/0x2a0
 get_signal+0x1fcd/0x2210
 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x93/0x780
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x140/0x290
 do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x250
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

In 'hci_conn_del_sysfs()', 'device_unregister()' may be called when
an underlying (kobject) reference counter is greater than 1. This
means that reparenting (happened when the device is actually freed)
is delayed and, during that delay, parent controller device (hciX)
may be deleted. Since the latter may create a dangling pointer to
freed parent, avoid that scenario by reparenting to NULL explicitly.

Weakness: CWE-416 (Use After Free)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2024-53237?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2024-53237?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2024-53237 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-53237 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2024-53237 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2024-53237 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Dec 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-53237 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-53237/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-53237/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53237
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2024-53237

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-53237/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
