CVE-2024-56655 netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu

High 7.8 Published Updated

A race condition in Linux kernel netfilter allows attackers to trigger a kernel warning and potential denial of service via improper rule destruction.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2024-56655?

CVE-2024-56655 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Dec 2024. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu

nf_tables_chain_destroy can sleep, it can't be used from call_rcu callbacks.

Moreover, nf_tables_rule_release() is only safe for error unwinding, while transaction mutex is held and the to-be-desroyed rule was not exposed to either dataplane or dumps, as it deactives+frees without the required synchronize_rcu() in-between.

nft_rule_expr_deactivate() callbacks will change ->use counters of other chains/sets, see e.g. nft_lookup .deactivate callback, these must be serialized via transaction mutex.

Also add a few lockdep asserts to make this more explicit.

Calling synchronize_rcu() isn't ideal, but fixing this without is hard and way more intrusive. As-is, we can get:

WARNING: .. net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:5515 nft_set_destroy+0x.. Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work RIP: 0010:nft_set_destroy+0x3fe/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x6b7/0xad0 process_one_work+0x64a/0xce0 worker_thread+0x613/0x10d0

In case the synchronize_rcu becomes an issue, we can explore alternatives.

One way would be to allocate nft_trans_rule objects + one nft_trans_chain object, deactivate the rules + the chain and then defer the freeing to the nft destroy workqueue. We'd still need to keep the synchronize_rcu path as a fallback to handle -ENOMEM corner cases though.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2024-56655?

It affects 1 product.

Products include Linux kernel.

How do I fix CVE-2024-56655?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Is CVE-2024-56655 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2024-56655 in the wild and no public exploit code.

All Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Sources

Also known as AZL-55300, BELL-CVE-2024-56655, DEBIAN-CVE-2024-56655, GHSA-4xh3-3533-7mmv, UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56655.

Is CVE-2024-56655 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free