{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including tech.powerjob:powerjob. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-11580 exists.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-11580 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-11580 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in PowerJob, published on 10 Oct 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-11580 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-11580 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in PowerJob, published on 10 Oct 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-11580 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- tech.powerjob:powerjob (Maven): affected all versions up to 5.1.2; no fix listed\n- tech.powerjob:powerjob (Maven): affected all versions up to 5.1.2; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-11580/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-11580/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-11580","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-11580/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-11580","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-87xj-ghmc-c3xq"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"PowerJob scheduling platform","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Remote attackers can access user list data without proper authorization in PowerJob, exposing sensitive information.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"VulDB","cpe":[{"product":"powerjob","vendor":"powerjob"}],"cvss":{"score":6.9,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-863","name":"Incorrect Authorization"},{"id":"CWE-862","name":"Missing Authorization"}],"description":"A weakness has been identified in PowerJob up to 5.1.2. This affects the function list of the file /user/list. This manipulation causes missing authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.","ecosystems":["Maven"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":1,"refs":[{"date":null,"kind":"nuclei","ref":"http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-11580.yaml","stars":null,"title":"PowerJob List - Authorization Bypass"}],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":false,"headline":"PowerJob list authorization","id":"CVE-2025-11580","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Maven","product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2025"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":5,"next":{"headline":"PowerJob OpenAPIController runJob authorization","id":"CVE-2025-11581"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["5.1.2"],"package":"tech.powerjob:powerjob","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-87xj-ghmc-c3xq"},{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["5.1.2"],"package":"tech.powerjob:powerjob","purl":"pkg:maven/tech.powerjob/powerjob","source":"GHSA-87xj-ghmc-c3xq"}],"prev":{"headline":"DoS via Out Of Memory Crash","id":"CVE-2025-11579"},"products":["PowerJob"],"published":"2025-10-10","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2024-44546","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-11-11"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Code injection in PowerJob","id":"CVE-2023-37754","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-07-28"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"PowerJob vulnerable to incorrect access control","id":"CVE-2023-29924","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-04-21"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"PowerJob vulnerable to remote code execution","id":"CVE-2023-29926","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-04-20"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"PowerJob incorrect access control vulnerability","id":"CVE-2023-36106","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-17"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials in PowerJob","id":"CVE-2020-28865","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-06-16"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"MIT","name":"Nuclei templates"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-02-24","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Remote attackers can access user list data without proper authorization in PowerJob, exposing sensitive information.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-11580/"}