{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including tech.powerjob:powerjob-common. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-14518 exists.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-14518 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-14518 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob, published on 11 Dec 2025. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-14518 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-14518 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob, published on 11 Dec 2025. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-14518 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- tech.powerjob:powerjob-common (Maven): affected all versions up to 5.1.2; no fix listed\n- tech.powerjob:powerjob-common (Maven): affected all versions up to 5.1.2; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-14518/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-14518/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-14518","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-14518/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-14518","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-8xqm-6fj2-hfgf"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"PowerJob scheduling system","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can exploit a server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob's connectivity check to access internal network resources.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"VulDB","cpe":[{"product":"powerjob","vendor":"powerjob"}],"cvss":{"score":5.3,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"A vulnerability was identified in PowerJob up to 5.1.2. This vulnerability affects the function checkConnectivity of the file src/main/java/tech/powerjob/common/utils/net/PingPongUtils.java of the component Network Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument targetIp/targetPort leads to server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.","ecosystems":["Maven"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":false,"headline":"PowerJob Network Request PingPongUtils.java checkConnectivity server-side request forgery","id":"CVE-2025-14518","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Maven","product":null,"products":[],"type":"ssrf","year":"2025"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"baowzh hfly advtext add cross site scripting","id":"CVE-2025-14519"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["5.1.2"],"package":"tech.powerjob:powerjob-common","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-8xqm-6fj2-hfgf"},{"ecosystem":"Maven","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["5.1.2"],"package":"tech.powerjob:powerjob-common","purl":"pkg:maven/tech.powerjob/powerjob-common","source":"GHSA-8xqm-6fj2-hfgf"}],"prev":{"headline":"Yalantis uCrop AndroidManifest.xml UCropActivity improper export of android application components","id":"CVE-2025-14517"},"products":["PowerJob"],"published":"2025-12-11","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2024-44546","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-11-11"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Code injection in PowerJob","id":"CVE-2023-37754","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-07-28"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"PowerJob vulnerable to incorrect access control","id":"CVE-2023-29924","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-04-21"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"PowerJob vulnerable to remote code execution","id":"CVE-2023-29926","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-04-20"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"PowerJob incorrect access control vulnerability","id":"CVE-2023-36106","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-17"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials in PowerJob","id":"CVE-2020-28865","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-06-16"},{"cvss_score":6.9,"headline":"PowerJob list authorization","id":"CVE-2025-11580","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-10-10"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-02-24","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can exploit a server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob's connectivity check to access internal network resources.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-14518/"}