# CVE-2025-21722: nilfs2: do not force clear folio if buffer is referenced

> A use-after-free vulnerability in the nilfs2 filesystem allows attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute code via corrupted filesystem states.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 27 Feb 2025
- **Updated:** 21 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2025-21722, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-21722, GHSA-6g66-96c8-x7cw, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-21722, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-21722

## What is CVE-2025-21722?

CVE-2025-21722 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Feb 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nilfs2: do not force clear folio if buffer is referenced

Patch series "nilfs2: protect busy buffer heads from being force-cleared".

This series fixes the buffer head state inconsistency issues reported by
syzbot that occurs when the filesystem is corrupted and falls back to
read-only, and the associated buffer head use-after-free issue.

This patch (of 2):

Syzbot has reported that after nilfs2 detects filesystem corruption and
falls back to read-only, inconsistencies in the buffer state may occur.

One of the inconsistencies is that when nilfs2 calls mark_buffer_dirty()
to set a data or metadata buffer as dirty, but it detects that the buffer
is not in the uptodate state:

 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6049 at fs/buffer.c:1177 mark_buffer_dirty+0x2e5/0x520
  fs/buffer.c:1177
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  nilfs_palloc_commit_alloc_entry+0x4b/0x160 fs/nilfs2/alloc.c:598
  nilfs_ifile_create_inode+0x1dd/0x3a0 fs/nilfs2/ifile.c:73
  nilfs_new_inode+0x254/0x830 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:344
  nilfs_mkdir+0x10d/0x340 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:218
  vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
  do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
  __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline]
  __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline]
  __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293
  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The other is when nilfs_btree_propagate(), which propagates the dirty
state to the ancestor nodes of a b-tree that point to a dirty buffer,
detects that the origin buffer is not dirty, even though it should be:

 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5245 at fs/nilfs2/btree.c:2089
  nilfs_btree_propagate+0xc79/0xdf0 fs/nilfs2/btree.c:2089
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  nilfs_bmap_propagate+0x75/0x120 fs/nilfs2/bmap.c:345
  nilfs_collect_file_data+0x4d/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:587
  nilfs_segctor_apply_buffers+0x184/0x340 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1006
  nilfs_segctor_scan_file+0x28c/0xa50 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1045
  nilfs_segctor_collect_blocks fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1216 [inline]
  nilfs_segctor_collect fs/nilfs2/segment.c:1540 [inline]
  nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x1c28/0x6b90 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2115
  nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2479
  nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2587 [inline]
  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x69e/0xe80 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2701
  kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
  ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
  </TASK>

Both of these issues are caused by the callbacks that handle the
page/folio write requests, forcibly clear various states, including the
working state of the buffers they hold, at unexpected times when they
detect read-only fallback.

Fix these issues by checking if the buffer is referenced before clearing
the page/folio state, and skipping the clear if it is.

Weakness: CWE-416 (Use After Free)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-21722?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2025-21722?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-21722 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-21722 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-21722 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-21722 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 27 Feb 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-21722 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-21722/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-21722/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21722
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21722

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-21722/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
