# CVE-2025-22010: RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop

> A local attacker can cause a CPU soft lockup and system hang by allocating large memory regions in the RDMA hns driver.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 8 Apr 2025
- **Updated:** 11 May 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-59754, AZL-59852, BELL-CVE-2025-22010, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-22010, GHSA-c2cr-w322-fppq, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-22010, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-22010

## What is CVE-2025-22010?

CVE-2025-22010 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 8 Apr 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop

Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with
buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated,
it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:

        watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!
        ...
        Call trace:
         hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290

        watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!
        ...
        Call trace:
         hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
         ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc

Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not
to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop
count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().

Weakness: CWE-667 (Improper Locking)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-22010?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2025-22010?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-22010 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-22010 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-22010 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-22010 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 8 Apr 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-22010 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22010/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22010/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22010
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-22010

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22010/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
