{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-22855 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-22855 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-22855 is a low-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS, published on 8 Apr 2025. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-22855 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-22855 is a low-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS, published on 8 Apr 2025. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-22855 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Fortinet FortiClientEMS. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22855/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22855/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-22855","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22855/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-22855","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-962v-6x3f-5mw4"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["code_execution"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"FortiClient EMS","requires_auth":"high_privilege","summary":"An EMS administrator can inject JavaScript into messages sent to FortiClient users, potentially executing code in their context.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"xss"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"fortinet","cpe":[{"product":"forticlientems","vendor":"fortinet"}],"cvss":{"score":2.6,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:C","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-79","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation"}],"description":"An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient before 7.4.1 may allow the EMS administrator to send messages containing javascript code.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2025-22855","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"xss","year":"2025"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Path traversal in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2025-22859"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Possible thread exhaustion from processing http responses in PingFederate Google Adapter","id":"CVE-2025-22854"},"products":["FortiClientEMS"],"published":"2025-04-08","related":[{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Fortinet FortiClient EMS Improper Access Control","id":"CVE-2026-35616","kev_date_added":"2026-04-06","published":"2026-04-04"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Fortinet FortiClient EMS SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2026-21643","kev_date_added":"2026-04-13","published":"2026-02-06"},{"cvss_score":7.7,"headline":"Auth bypass in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2024-23106","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-01-14"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"SQL injection in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2025-59922","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-01-13"},{"cvss_score":6.7,"headline":"Security feature bypass in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2026-59836","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-07-14"},{"cvss_score":6.2,"headline":"SQL injection in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2026-39809","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-14"},{"cvss_score":5.4,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in FortiClientEMS","id":"CVE-2019-16149","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-03-28"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-04-08","vendors":["Fortinet"]},"summary":"An EMS administrator can inject JavaScript into messages sent to FortiClient users, potentially executing code in their context.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22855/"}