{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/usememos/memos. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-22952 exists.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2025-22952 is a critical server-side request forgery vulnerability in Usememos Memos, published on 27 Feb 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-22952 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-22952 is a critical server-side request forgery vulnerability in Usememos Memos, published on 27 Feb 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-22952 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- github.com/usememos/memos (Go): affected all versions; no fix listed\n- github.com/usememos/memos (Go): affected all versions up to 0.24.0; no fix listed\n- github.com/usememos/memos (Go): affected all versions up to 0.24.0; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22952/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22952/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-22952","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22952/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-22952","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-wfxg-v3j4-7qmj","GO-2025-3492"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Memos note-taking app","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can exploit insufficient URL validation in Memos to perform Server-Side Request Forgery, potentially accessing internal resources.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"memos","vendor":"usememos"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"elestio memos v0.23.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, which can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks.","ecosystems":["Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":1,"refs":[{"date":null,"kind":"nuclei","ref":"http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22952.yaml","stars":null,"title":"Elestio Memos \u003c= v0.24.0 - Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Memos Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)","id":"CVE-2025-22952","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Go","product":"usememos:memos","products":["usememos:memos"],"type":"ssrf","year":"2025"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"SQL injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-22953"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/usememos/memos","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/usememos/memos","source":"GO-2025-3492"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["0.24.0"],"package":"github.com/usememos/memos","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-wfxg-v3j4-7qmj"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["0.24.0"],"package":"github.com/usememos/memos","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/usememos/memos","source":"GHSA-wfxg-v3j4-7qmj"}],"prev":{"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-22949"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2025-02-27","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Memos has Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in Image URLs","id":"CVE-2025-50738","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-07-29"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Stored XSS in usememos/memos","id":"CVE-2023-0109","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-11-15"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Access Control in usememos/memos","id":"CVE-2023-4696","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-09-01"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in usememos/memos","id":"CVE-2022-4866","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-12-31"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Handling of Values in usememos/memos","id":"CVE-2022-4851","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-12-29"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in usememos/memos","id":"CVE-2022-4797","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-12-28"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"MIT","name":"Nuclei templates"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-03-03","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can exploit insufficient URL validation in Memos to perform Server-Side Request Forgery, potentially accessing internal resources.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-22952/"}