# CVE-2025-38324: mpls: Use rcu_dereference_rtnl() in mpls_route_input_rcu().

> A race condition in the Linux kernel MPLS subsystem can trigger a kernel warning and potential denial of service due to incorrect RCU usage.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 10 Jul 2025
- **Updated:** 11 May 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-64953, BELL-CVE-2025-38324, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-38324, GHSA-94vx-8jmh-wjcj, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-38324, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-38324, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2025-38324, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-38324, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38324

## What is CVE-2025-38324?

CVE-2025-38324 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 10 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mpls: Use rcu_dereference_rtnl() in mpls_route_input_rcu().

As syzbot reported [0], mpls_route_input_rcu() can be called
from mpls_getroute(), where is under RTNL.

net->mpls.platform_label is only updated under RTNL.

Let's use rcu_dereference_rtnl() in mpls_route_input_rcu() to
silence the splat.

[0]:
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-00082-g5cdb2c77c4c3 #0 Not tainted
 ----------------------------
net/mpls/af_mpls.c:84 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by syz.2.4451/17730:
 #0: ffffffff9012a3e8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff9012a3e8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x371/0xe90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6961

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 17730 Comm: syz.2.4451 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-00082-g5cdb2c77c4c3 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x166/0x260 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6865
 mpls_route_input_rcu+0x1d4/0x200 net/mpls/af_mpls.c:84
 mpls_getroute+0x621/0x1ea0 net/mpls/af_mpls.c:2381
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c9/0xe90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6964
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x16d/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2534
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1313 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x53a/0x7f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1339
 netlink_sendmsg+0x8d1/0xdd0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1883
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:712 [inline]
 __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:727 [inline]
 ____sys_sendmsg+0xa98/0xc70 net/socket.c:2566
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x134/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2620
 __sys_sendmmsg+0x200/0x420 net/socket.c:2709
 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2736 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2733 [inline]
 __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9c/0x100 net/socket.c:2733
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f0a2818e969
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f0a28f52038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0a283b5fa0 RCX: 00007f0a2818e969
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000200000000080 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f0a28210ab1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f0a283b5fa0 R15: 00007ffce5e9f268
 </TASK>

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-38324?

It affects 2 products.


Products: Debian Debian Linux, Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2025-38324?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-38324 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38324 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Debian Debian Linux

- [CVE-2015-3306](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-3306/): ProFTPD Improper Access Control (critical 10.0, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-49113](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-49113/): RoundCube Webmail Deserialization of Untrusted Data (critical 9.9, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-24061](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-24061/): GNU InetUtils Argument Injection (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-39682](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39682/): Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2024-9680](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-9680/): Mozilla Firefox Use-After-Free (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-38324 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-38324 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 10 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38324 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Debian Debian Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38324/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38324/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38324
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38324
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-38324

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38324/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
