# CVE-2025-38347: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid

> A missing sanity check in the f2fs filesystem allows a local attacker to cause a system hang or denial of service.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 10 Jul 2025
- **Updated:** 12 May 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-64928, AZL-72838, BELL-CVE-2025-38347, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-38347, GHSA-7f4h-56p4-253w, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-38347, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-38347, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2025-38347, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-38347, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38347

## What is CVE-2025-38347?

CVE-2025-38347 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 10 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid

syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below:

INFO: task syz-executor140:5308 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
      Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-syzkaller-00069-g81e4f8d68c66 #0
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor140 state:D stack:24016 pid:5308  tgid:5308  ppid:5306   task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00000006
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5378 [inline]
 __schedule+0x190e/0x4c90 kernel/sched/core.c:6765
 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6842 [inline]
 schedule+0x14b/0x320 kernel/sched/core.c:6857
 io_schedule+0x8d/0x110 kernel/sched/core.c:7690
 folio_wait_bit_common+0x839/0xee0 mm/filemap.c:1317
 __folio_lock mm/filemap.c:1664 [inline]
 folio_lock include/linux/pagemap.h:1163 [inline]
 __filemap_get_folio+0x147/0xb40 mm/filemap.c:1917
 pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x130 mm/folio-compat.c:87
 find_get_page_flags include/linux/pagemap.h:842 [inline]
 f2fs_grab_cache_page+0x2b/0x320 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776
 __get_node_page+0x131/0x11b0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1463
 read_xattr_block+0xfb/0x190 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:306
 lookup_all_xattrs fs/f2fs/xattr.c:355 [inline]
 f2fs_getxattr+0x676/0xf70 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:533
 __f2fs_get_acl+0x52/0x870 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:375 [inline]
 f2fs_init_acl+0xd7/0x9b0 fs/f2fs/acl.c:418
 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0xa0f/0x1050 fs/f2fs/dir.c:539
 f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x448/0x860 fs/f2fs/inline.c:666
 f2fs_add_dentry+0xba/0x1e0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:765
 f2fs_do_add_link+0x28c/0x3a0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:808
 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3616 [inline]
 f2fs_mknod+0x2e8/0x5b0 fs/f2fs/namei.c:766
 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4191
 unix_bind_bsd net/unix/af_unix.c:1286 [inline]
 unix_bind+0x563/0xe30 net/unix/af_unix.c:1379
 __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1817 [inline]
 __sys_bind+0x1e4/0x290 net/socket.c:1848
 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1853 [inline]
 __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1851 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1851
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Let's dump and check metadata of corrupted inode, it shows its xattr_nid
is the same to its i_ino.

dump.f2fs -i 3 chaseyu.img.raw
i_xattr_nid                             [0x       3 : 3]

So that, during mknod in the corrupted directory, it tries to get and
lock inode page twice, result in deadlock.

- f2fs_mknod
 - f2fs_add_inline_entry
  - f2fs_get_inode_page --- lock dir's inode page
   - f2fs_init_acl
    - f2fs_acl_create(dir,..)
     - __f2fs_get_acl
      - f2fs_getxattr
       - lookup_all_xattrs
        - __get_node_page --- try to lock dir's inode page

In order to fix this, let's add sanity check on ino and xnid.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-38347?

It affects 2 products.


Products: Debian Debian Linux, Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2025-38347?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-38347 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38347 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Debian Debian Linux

- [CVE-2015-3306](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-3306/): ProFTPD Improper Access Control (critical 10.0, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-49113](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-49113/): RoundCube Webmail Deserialization of Untrusted Data (critical 9.9, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-24061](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-24061/): GNU InetUtils Argument Injection (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-39682](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39682/): Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2024-9680](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-9680/): Mozilla Firefox Use-After-Free (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-38347 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-38347 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 10 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38347 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Debian Debian Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38347/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38347/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38347
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-38347

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38347/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
