# CVE-2025-38468: net/sched: Return NULL when htb_lookup_leaf encounters an empty rbtree

> A local attacker can trigger a kernel crash via specific traffic control commands, causing a denial of service.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 28 Jul 2025
- **Updated:** 15 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-65910, AZL-72965, BELL-CVE-2025-38468, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-38468, GHSA-4mqg-q94g-wmfr, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-38468, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-38468, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2025-38468, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-38468, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38468

## What is CVE-2025-38468?

CVE-2025-38468 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 28 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: Return NULL when htb_lookup_leaf encounters an empty rbtree

htb_lookup_leaf has a BUG_ON that can trigger with the following:

tc qdisc del dev lo root
tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 1
tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 64bit
tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:1 handle 2: netem
tc qdisc add dev lo parent 2:1 handle 3: blackhole
ping -I lo -c1 -W0.001 127.0.0.1

The root cause is the following:

1. htb_dequeue calls htb_dequeue_tree which calls the dequeue handler on
   the selected leaf qdisc
2. netem_dequeue calls enqueue on the child qdisc
3. blackhole_enqueue drops the packet and returns a value that is not
   just NET_XMIT_SUCCESS
4. Because of this, netem_dequeue calls qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, and
   since qlen is now 0, it calls htb_qlen_notify -> htb_deactivate ->
   htb_deactiviate_prios -> htb_remove_class_from_row -> htb_safe_rb_erase
5. As this is the only class in the selected hprio rbtree,
   __rb_change_child in __rb_erase_augmented sets the rb_root pointer to
   NULL
6. Because blackhole_dequeue returns NULL, netem_dequeue returns NULL,
   which causes htb_dequeue_tree to call htb_lookup_leaf with the same
   hprio rbtree, and fail the BUG_ON

The function graph for this scenario is shown here:
 0)               |  htb_enqueue() {
 0) + 13.635 us   |    netem_enqueue();
 0)   4.719 us    |    htb_activate_prios();
 0) # 2249.199 us |  }
 0)               |  htb_dequeue() {
 0)   2.355 us    |    htb_lookup_leaf();
 0)               |    netem_dequeue() {
 0) + 11.061 us   |      blackhole_enqueue();
 0)               |      qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog() {
 0)               |        qdisc_lookup_rcu() {
 0)   1.873 us    |          qdisc_match_from_root();
 0)   6.292 us    |        }
 0)   1.894 us    |        htb_search();
 0)               |        htb_qlen_notify() {
 0)   2.655 us    |          htb_deactivate_prios();
 0)   6.933 us    |        }
 0) + 25.227 us   |      }
 0)   1.983 us    |      blackhole_dequeue();
 0) + 86.553 us   |    }
 0) # 2932.761 us |    qdisc_warn_nonwc();
 0)               |    htb_lookup_leaf() {
 0)               |      BUG_ON();
 ------------------------------------------

The full original bug report can be seen here [1].

We can fix this just by returning NULL instead of the BUG_ON,
as htb_dequeue_tree returns NULL when htb_lookup_leaf returns
NULL.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/pF5XOOIim0IuEfhI-SOxTgRvNoDwuux7UHKnE_Y5-zVd4wmGvNk2ceHjKb8ORnzw0cGwfmVu42g9dL7XyJLf1NEzaztboTWcm0Ogxuojoeo=@willsroot.io/

Weakness: CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-38468?

It affects 2 products.


Products: Debian Debian Linux, Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2025-38468?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-38468 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38468 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Debian Debian Linux

- [CVE-2015-3306](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2015-3306/): ProFTPD Improper Access Control (critical 10.0, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-49113](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-49113/): RoundCube Webmail Deserialization of Untrusted Data (critical 9.9, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-24061](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-24061/): GNU InetUtils Argument Injection (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2025-39682](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39682/): Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2024-9680](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2024-9680/): Mozilla Firefox Use-After-Free (critical 9.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-38468 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-38468 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Debian Debian Linux, published on 28 Jul 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-38468 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Debian Debian Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38468/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38468/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38468
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-38468

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-38468/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.