# CVE-2025-39767: LoongArch: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT/GOT counting > A local attacker can cause a soft deadlock and system hang by loading specific kernel modules under certain debug configurations. - **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`) - **Exploited in the wild:** Not known - **Login needed:** Any signed-in user - **Attackable:** Local or same network only - **Victim action needed:** Not needed - **Fix available:** Yes - **Published:** 11 Sep 2025 - **Updated:** 11 May 2026 - **Also known as:** AZL-67193, BELL-CVE-2025-39767, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-39767, GHSA-2pv7-jfgv-x3fr, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-39767, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-13-CVE-2025-39767, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39767 ## What is CVE-2025-39767? CVE-2025-39767 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 11 Sep 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim. ### Official description In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT/GOT counting When enabling CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY at the same time, there will be soft deadlock, the relevant logs are as follows: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU ... Call Trace: [<900000000024f9e4>] show_stack+0x5c/0x180 [<90000000002482f4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x94/0xbc [<9000000000224544>] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x1fc/0x280 [<900000000037ac80>] rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x720/0xf88 [<9000000000396c34>] update_process_times+0xb4/0x150 [<90000000003b2474>] tick_nohz_handler+0xf4/0x250 [<9000000000397e28>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1d0/0x428 [<9000000000399b2c>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x214/0x538 [<9000000000253634>] constant_timer_interrupt+0x64/0x80 [<9000000000349938>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x1a0 [<9000000000349a78>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x18/0x88 [<9000000000354c00>] handle_percpu_irq+0x90/0xf0 [<9000000000348c74>] handle_irq_desc+0x94/0xb8 [<9000000001012b28>] handle_cpu_irq+0x68/0xa0 [<9000000001def8c0>] handle_loongarch_irq+0x30/0x48 [<9000000001def958>] do_vint+0x80/0xd0 [<9000000000268a0c>] kasan_mem_to_shadow.part.0+0x2c/0x2a0 [<90000000006344f4>] __asan_load8+0x4c/0x120 [<900000000025c0d0>] module_frob_arch_sections+0x5c8/0x6b8 [<90000000003895f0>] load_module+0x9e0/0x2958 [<900000000038b770>] __do_sys_init_module+0x208/0x2d0 [<9000000001df0c34>] do_syscall+0x94/0x190 [<900000000024d6fc>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 After analysis, this is because the slow speed of loading the amdgpu module leads to the long time occupation of the cpu and then the soft deadlock. When loading a module, module_frob_arch_sections() tries to figure out the number of PLTs/GOTs that will be needed to handle all the RELAs. It will call the count_max_entries() to find in an out-of-order date which counting algorithm has O(n^2) complexity. To make it faster, we sort the relocation list by info and addend. That way, to check for a duplicate relocation, it just needs to compare with the previous entry. This reduces the complexity of the algorithm to O(n log n), as done in commit d4e0340919fb ("arm64/module: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT counting"). This gives sinificant reduction in module load time for modules with large number of relocations. After applying this patch, the soft deadlock problem has been solved, and the kernel starts normally without "Call Trace". Using the default configuration to test some modules, the results are as follows: Module Size ip_tables 36K fat 143K radeon 2.5MB amdgpu 16MB Without this patch: Module Module load time (ms) Count(PLTs/GOTs) ip_tables 18 59/6 fat 0 162/14 radeon 54 1221/84 amdgpu 1411 4525/1098 With this patch: Module Module load time (ms) Count(PLTs/GOTs) ip_tables 18 59/6 fat 0 162/14 radeon 22 1221/84 amdgpu 45 4525/1098 Weakness: CWE-667 (Improper Locking) ## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-39767? It affects 1 product. Products: Linux kernel. ## How do I fix CVE-2025-39767? Apply the vendor's patch. ## Is CVE-2025-39767 being exploited? There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-39767 in the wild and no public exploit code. ## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel - [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild) - [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild) - [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild) - [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild) - [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild) ## Fix prompt for AI coding agents ```text Check this codebase for CVE-2025-39767 and fix it if it is affected. What it is: CVE-2025-39767 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 11 Sep 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim. Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-39767 in the wild and no public exploit code. Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page. Task: 1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies. 2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it. 3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead. 4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why. 5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing. Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39767/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39767/index.md) ``` ## Sources - CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39767 - NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39767 - OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-39767 --- From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-39767/ Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.