# CVE-2025-40027: net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled

> A race condition in the Linux kernel's 9p filesystem allows a local attacker to trigger a double free, causing a system crash.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 28 Oct 2025
- **Updated:** 5 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-68921, BELL-CVE-2025-40027, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-40027, GHSA-wv8v-rm52-wq8h, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-40027, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-40027, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-13-CVE-2025-40027, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2025-40027, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-40027, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40027

## What is CVE-2025-40027?

CVE-2025-40027 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled

Syzkaller reports a KASAN issue as below:

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000021: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000108-0xdead00000000010f]
CPU: 0 PID: 5083 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.134-syzkaller-00037-g855bd1d7d838 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__list_del include/linux/list.h:114 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry include/linux/list.h:137 [inline]
RIP: 0010:list_del include/linux/list.h:148 [inline]
RIP: 0010:p9_fd_cancelled+0xe9/0x200 net/9p/trans_fd.c:734

Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 p9_client_flush+0x351/0x440 net/9p/client.c:614
 p9_client_rpc+0xb6b/0xc70 net/9p/client.c:734
 p9_client_version net/9p/client.c:920 [inline]
 p9_client_create+0xb51/0x1240 net/9p/client.c:1027
 v9fs_session_init+0x1f0/0x18f0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:408
 v9fs_mount+0xba/0xcb0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126
 legacy_get_tree+0x108/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:632
 vfs_get_tree+0x8e/0x300 fs/super.c:1573
 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3056 [inline]
 path_mount+0x6a6/0x1e90 fs/namespace.c:3386
 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3399 [inline]
 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3607 [inline]
 __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3584 [inline]
 __x64_sys_mount+0x283/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3584
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8

This happens because of a race condition between:

- The 9p client sending an invalid flush request and later cleaning it up;
- The 9p client in p9_read_work() canceled all pending requests.

      Thread 1                              Thread 2
    ...
    p9_client_create()
    ...
    p9_fd_create()
    ...
    p9_conn_create()
    ...
    // start Thread 2
    INIT_WORK(&m->rq, p9_read_work);
                                        p9_read_work()
    ...
    p9_client_rpc()
    ...
                                        ...
                                        p9_conn_cancel()
                                        ...
                                        spin_lock(&m->req_lock);
    ...
    p9_fd_cancelled()
    ...
                                        ...
                                        spin_unlock(&m->req_lock);
                                        // status rewrite
                                        p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR)
                                        // first remove
                                        list_del(&req->req_list);
                                        ...

    spin_lock(&m->req_lock)
    ...
    // second remove
    list_del(&req->req_list);
    spin_unlock(&m->req_lock)
  ...

Commit 74d6a5d56629 ("9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in
p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work") fixes a concurrency issue in the 9p filesystem
client where the req_list could be deleted simultaneously by both
p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled functions, but for the case where req->status
equals REQ_STATUS_RCVD.

Update the check for req->status in p9_fd_cancelled to skip processing not
just received requests, but anything that is not SENT, as whatever
changed the state from SENT also removed the request from its list.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

[updated the check from status == RECV || status == ERROR to status != SENT]

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-40027?


## How do I fix CVE-2025-40027?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-40027 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-40027 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-40027 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-40027 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-40027 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40027/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40027/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40027
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-40027

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40027/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
