# CVE-2025-40244: hfsplus: fix KMSAN uninit-value issue in __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent()

> A local attacker can trigger an uninitialized value bug in the HFS+ filesystem driver, potentially leaking kernel memory contents.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 4 Dec 2025
- **Updated:** 5 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2025-40244, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-40244, GHSA-38x9-7hc9-22jf, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-40244, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-40244, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40244

## What is CVE-2025-40244?

CVE-2025-40244 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 4 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hfsplus: fix KMSAN uninit-value issue in __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent()

The syzbot reported issue in __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent():

[   70.194323][ T9350] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent+0x7d0/0x990
[   70.195022][ T9350]  __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent+0x7d0/0x990
[   70.195530][ T9350]  hfsplus_file_extend+0x74f/0x1cf0
[   70.195998][ T9350]  hfsplus_get_block+0xe16/0x17b0
[   70.196458][ T9350]  __block_write_begin_int+0x962/0x2ce0
[   70.196959][ T9350]  cont_write_begin+0x1000/0x1950
[   70.197416][ T9350]  hfsplus_write_begin+0x85/0x130
[   70.197873][ T9350]  generic_perform_write+0x3e8/0x1060
[   70.198374][ T9350]  __generic_file_write_iter+0x215/0x460
[   70.198892][ T9350]  generic_file_write_iter+0x109/0x5e0
[   70.199393][ T9350]  vfs_write+0xb0f/0x14e0
[   70.199771][ T9350]  ksys_write+0x23e/0x490
[   70.200149][ T9350]  __x64_sys_write+0x97/0xf0
[   70.200570][ T9350]  x64_sys_call+0x3015/0x3cf0
[   70.201065][ T9350]  do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1d0
[   70.201506][ T9350]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[   70.202054][ T9350]
[   70.202279][ T9350] Uninit was created at:
[   70.202693][ T9350]  __kmalloc_noprof+0x621/0xf80
[   70.203149][ T9350]  hfsplus_find_init+0x8d/0x1d0
[   70.203602][ T9350]  hfsplus_file_extend+0x6ca/0x1cf0
[   70.204087][ T9350]  hfsplus_get_block+0xe16/0x17b0
[   70.204561][ T9350]  __block_write_begin_int+0x962/0x2ce0
[   70.205074][ T9350]  cont_write_begin+0x1000/0x1950
[   70.205547][ T9350]  hfsplus_write_begin+0x85/0x130
[   70.206017][ T9350]  generic_perform_write+0x3e8/0x1060
[   70.206519][ T9350]  __generic_file_write_iter+0x215/0x460
[   70.207042][ T9350]  generic_file_write_iter+0x109/0x5e0
[   70.207552][ T9350]  vfs_write+0xb0f/0x14e0
[   70.207961][ T9350]  ksys_write+0x23e/0x490
[   70.208375][ T9350]  __x64_sys_write+0x97/0xf0
[   70.208810][ T9350]  x64_sys_call+0x3015/0x3cf0
[   70.209255][ T9350]  do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1d0
[   70.209680][ T9350]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[   70.210230][ T9350]
[   70.210454][ T9350] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 9350 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #5
[   70.211174][ T9350] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   70.212115][ T9350] =====================================================
[   70.212734][ T9350] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[   70.213284][ T9350] Kernel panic - not syncing: kmsan.panic set ...
[   70.213858][ T9350] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 9350 Comm: repro Tainted: G    B              6.12.0-rc5 #5
[   70.214679][ T9350] Tainted: [B]=BAD_PAGE
[   70.215057][ T9350] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   70.215999][ T9350] Call Trace:
[   70.216309][ T9350]  <TASK>
[   70.216585][ T9350]  dump_stack_lvl+0x1fd/0x2b0
[   70.217025][ T9350]  dump_stack+0x1e/0x30
[   70.217421][ T9350]  panic+0x502/0xca0
[   70.217803][ T9350]  ? kmsan_get_metadata+0x13e/0x1c0

[   70.218294][ Message fromT sy9350]  kmsan_report+0x296/slogd@syzkaller 0x2aat Aug 18 22:11:058 ...
 kernel
:[   70.213284][ T9350] Kernel panic - not syncing: kmsan.panic [   70.220179][ T9350]  ? kmsan_get_metadata+0x13e/0x1c0
set ...
[   70.221254][ T9350]  ? __msan_warning+0x96/0x120
[   70.222066][ T9350]  ? __hfsplus_ext_cache_extent+0x7d0/0x990
[   70.223023][ T9350]  ? hfsplus_file_extend+0x74f/0x1cf0
[   70.224120][ T9350]  ? hfsplus_get_block+0xe16/0x17b0
[   70.224946][ T9350]  ? __block_write_begin_int+0x962/0x2ce0
[   70.225756][ T9350]  ? cont_write_begin+0x1000/0x1950
[   70.226337][ T9350]  ? hfsplus_write_begin+0x85/0x130
[   70.226852][ T9350]  ? generic_perform_write+0x3e8/0x1060
[   70.227405][ T9350]  ? __generic_file_write_iter+0x215/0x460
[   70.227979][ T9350]  ? generic_file_write_iter+0x109/0x5e0
[   70.228540][ T9350]  ? vfs_write+0xb0f/0x14e0
[   70.228997][ T9350]  ? ksys_write+0x23e/0x490
---truncated---

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-40244?


## How do I fix CVE-2025-40244?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-40244 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-40244 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-40244 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-40244 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 4 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-40244 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40244/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40244/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40244
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-40244

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-40244/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
