{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-50975 exists.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-50975 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-50975 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in n/a, published on 26 Aug 2025. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-50975 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-50975 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability in n/a, published on 26 Aug 2025. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2025-50975 exists.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-50975/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-50975/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-50975","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-50975/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-50975","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-c7fh-m339-6279"],"analysis":{"component_type":"network_device","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["account_takeover","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"IPFire firewall","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Authenticated administrators can inject persistent JavaScript into IPFire firewall rules, leading to session hijacking and unauthorized actions when viewed by other admins.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"xss"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"ipfire","vendor":"ipfire"}],"cvss":{"score":5.4,"severity":"medium","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-79","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation"}],"description":"IPFire 2.29 web-based firewall interface (firewall.cgi) fails to sanitize several rule parameters such as PROT, SRC_PORT, TGT_PORT, dnatport, key, ruleremark, src_addr, std_net_tgt, and tgt_addr, allowing an authenticated administrator to inject persistent JavaScript. This stored XSS payload is executed whenever another admin views the firewall rules page, enabling session hijacking, unauthorized actions within the interface, or further internal pivoting. Exploitation requires only high-privilege GUI access, and the complexity of the attack is low.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-50975","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"xss","year":"2025"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-50976"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-50974"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2025-08-26","related":[{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2021-33393","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-06-09"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2018-16232","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-10-17"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2017-9757","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-06-19"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"IPFire \u003c v2.29 Command Injection via Proxy Report Creation","id":"CVE-2025-34311","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-10-28"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"IPFire \u003c v2.29 Command Injection via URL Filter Blacklist","id":"CVE-2025-34312","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-10-28"},{"cvss_score":7.1,"headline":"IPFire \u003c v2.29 SQL Injection via OpenVPN Connection Logs","id":"CVE-2025-34304","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-10-28"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Command injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-50974","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-08-26"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-08-27","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Authenticated administrators can inject persistent JavaScript into IPFire firewall rules, leading to session hijacking and unauthorized actions when viewed by other admins.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-50975/"}