{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including octoprint. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-58180 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade octoprint to 1.11.3 or later.","what":"CVE-2025-58180 is a high-severity command injection vulnerability in OctoPrint, published on 9 Sep 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-58180 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-58180 is a high-severity command injection vulnerability in OctoPrint, published on 9 Sep 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-58180 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- octoprint (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.11.3\n- octoprint (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.11.3\n- octoprint (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.11.3\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-58180/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-58180/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-58180","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-58180/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-58180","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc","PYSEC-2026-1712"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["code_execution"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"3D printer web interface","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Authenticated attackers can execute arbitrary commands via crafted filenames in OctoPrint if system event handlers are configured.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"command_injection"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"octoprint","vendor":"octoprint"}],"cvss":{"score":7.5,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-78","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command"}],"description":"OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.2 contain a vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker to upload a file under a specially crafted filename that will allow arbitrary command execution if said filename becomes included in a command defined in a system event handler and said event gets triggered. If no event handlers executing system commands with uploaded filenames as parameters have been configured, this vulnerability does not have an impact. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.11.3. As a workaround, OctoPrint administrators who have event handlers configured that include any kind of filename based placeholders should disable those by setting their `enabled` property to `False` or unchecking the \"Enabled\" checkbox in the GUI based Event Manager. Alternatively, OctoPrint administrators should set `feature.enforceReallyUniversalFilenames` to `true` in `config.yaml` and restart OctoPrint, then vet the existing uploads and make sure to delete any suspicious looking files. As always, OctoPrint administrators are advised to not expose OctoPrint on hostile networks like the public internet, and to vet who has access to their instance.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":1,"first_seen":"2025-09-09","github_poc":1,"max_poc_stars":0,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[{"date":"2025-09-09T08:32:49Z","kind":"github_poc","ref":"https://github.com/prabhatverma47/CVE-2025-58180","stars":0,"title":"In OctoPrint version \u003c=1.11.2, an attacker with file upload access (e.g., valid API key or session) can craft a malicious filename that bypasses sanitization and is later executed by OctoPrint’s event system, leading to remote code execution (RCE) on the host"},{"date":"2026-02-04","kind":"exploitdb","ref":"52476","stars":null,"title":"OctoPrint 1.11.2 - File Upload"}],"tier":"poc_unverified"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"OctoPrint is Vulnerable to RCE Attacks via Unsanitized Filename in File Upload","id":"CVE-2025-58180","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"command_injection","year":"2025"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Unbounded memory consumption in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh","id":"CVE-2025-58181"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.11.3"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"octoprint","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.11.3"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"octoprint","purl":"pkg:pypi/octoprint","source":"GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["1.11.3"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"octoprint","purl":"pkg:pypi/octoprint","source":"PYSEC-2026-1712"}],"prev":{"headline":"Astro Cloudflare adapter is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via /_image endpoint","id":"CVE-2025-58179"},"products":["OctoPrint"],"published":"2025-09-09","related":[{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2018-16710","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2018-09-07"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - DOM in octoprint/octoprint","id":"CVE-2022-1430","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-18"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Generic in octoprint/octoprint","id":"CVE-2022-1432","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-05-18"},{"cvss_score":7.1,"headline":"OctoPrint Authentication Bypass via X-Forwarded-For Header when autologinLocal is enabled","id":"CVE-2024-32977","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-05-14"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"OctoPrint Vulnerable to Denial of Service through malformed HTTP request","id":"CVE-2025-48879","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-06-10"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"OctoPrint Incorrect Access Control","id":"CVE-2021-32560","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-05-11"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"GPL-2.0-or-later","name":"Exploit-DB"},{"class":"open","licence":"CC0","name":"PoC-in-GitHub"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-09-10","vendors":["OctoPrint"]},"summary":"Authenticated attackers can execute arbitrary commands via crafted filenames in OctoPrint if system event handlers are configured.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-58180/"}