{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-67791 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-67791 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-67791 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Dec 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-67791 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-67791 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in n/a, published on 17 Dec 2025. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-67791 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: n/a. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-67791/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-67791/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-67791","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-67791/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-67791","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-7ghc-hf7m-mg9f"],"analysis":{"component_type":"desktop_application","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["privilege_escalation","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"DriveLock Enterprise Service","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can impersonate DriveLock agents due to incomplete tenant configuration, potentially escalating privileges or bypassing security controls.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"auth_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"mitre","cpe":[{"product":"drivelock","vendor":"drivelock"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-287","name":"Improper Authentication"}],"description":"An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 through 24.1.*, 24.2 through 24.2.*, and 25.1 through 25.1.*. An incomplete configuration (agent authentication) in DriveLock tenant allows attackers to impersonate any DriveLock agent on the network against the DES (DriveLock Enterprise Service).","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"Auth bypass in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67791","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"auth_bypass","year":"2025"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67792"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67790"},"products":["n/a"],"published":"2025-12-17","related":[{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67781","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-17"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-55187","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-09-26"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67790","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-17"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67793","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-17"},{"cvss_score":9.6,"headline":"Cross-site scripting in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67787","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-17"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"Privilege escalation in n/a","id":"CVE-2025-67792","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-17"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-12-18","vendors":["n/a"]},"summary":"Attackers can impersonate DriveLock agents due to incomplete tenant configuration, potentially escalating privileges or bypassing security controls.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-67791/"}