{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-9612 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2025-9612 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2025-9612 is a medium-severity vulnerability in PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification, published on 9 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2025-9612 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2025-9612 is a medium-severity vulnerability in PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification, published on 9 Dec 2025. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2025-9612 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-9612/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-9612/index.md)","id":"CVE-2025-9612","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-9612/index.md","name":"CVE-2025-9612","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-g6rm-vh26-9g98"],"analysis":{"component_type":"hardware_firmware","fix_type":"no_fix_stated","impacts":["data_modify","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"PCIe IDE Specification","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Local attackers can replay or reorder encrypted PCIe packets due to insufficient specification guidance, violating data integrity protections.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"other"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"certcc","cpe":[{"product":"pci_express_integrity_and_data_encryption","vendor":"pcisig"}],"cvss":{"score":5.1,"severity":"medium","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[],"description":"An issue was discovered in the PCI Express (PCIe) Integrity and Data Encryption (IDE) specification, where insufficient guidance on Transaction Layer Packet (TLP) ordering and tag uniqueness may allow encrypted packets to be replayed or reordered without detection. This can enable local or physical attackers on the PCIe bus to violate data integrity protections.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":null,"headline":"CVE-2025-9612","id":"CVE-2025-9612","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"other","year":"2025"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"CVE-2025-9613","id":"CVE-2025-9613"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Microsoft Playwright MCP Server \u003c 0.0.40 DNS Rebinding via Missing Origin Header Validation","id":"CVE-2025-9611"},"products":["PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification"],"published":"2025-12-09","related":[{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"CVE-2025-9613","id":"CVE-2025-9613","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-09"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"CVE-2025-9614","id":"CVE-2025-9614","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2025-12-09"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2025-12-11","vendors":["PCI-SIG"]},"summary":"Local attackers can replay or reorder encrypted PCIe packets due to insufficient specification guidance, violating data integrity protections.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2025-9612/"}