# CVE-2026-103602: Name constraints bypass via trailing dot in rfc822Name, dNSName and URI hosts

> Attackers can bypass certificate name constraints in Bouncy Castle C# by using trailing dots in hostnames, allowing unauthorized certificates to be accepted.

- **Severity:** High 8.2 (`CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 2 Oct 2026
- **Updated:** 2 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** GHSA-mx2f-845p-2h26

## What is CVE-2026-103602?

CVE-2026-103602 is a high-severity vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp, published on 2 Oct 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

Improper certificate validation in PkixNameConstraintValidator in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an attacker who controls, or can obtain certificates from, a name-constrained intermediate CA to have certificates accepted during PKIX certification path validation for email addresses, DNS names or URI hosts that lie within excluded subtrees applying to that CA, via an rfc822Name, dNSName or uniformResourceIdentifier name whose host ends with a dot, because names and constraints were compared without first removing the RFC 1034 root-label trailing dot, so a fully qualified host name did not match an excluded subtree for the same host written without the dot.

Weakness: CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-103602?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Bouncycastle Bc-Csharp.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-103602?

No fix has been published for CVE-2026-103602 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2026-103602 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-103602 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp

- [CVE-2026-63569](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-63569/): MTI/A0 DHAgreement does not validate the peer's ephemeral value (critical 9.1)
- [CVE-2026-103600](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103600/): Unbounded ASN.1 nesting depth causes process-terminating stack overflow (high 8.7)
- [CVE-2026-103603](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103603/): Unbounded HSS public key level count allows huge array allocation during signature verification (high 8.7)
- [CVE-2026-103604](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103604/): Quadratic-time escaping when converting X.509 distinguished names to strings (high 8.7)
- [CVE-2026-16000](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-16000/): KCcmBlockCipher (DSTU 7624 CCM) tag not bound to nonce when no associated data is used (high 8.7)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-103602 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-103602 is a high-severity vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp, published on 2 Oct 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-103602 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103602/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103602/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-103602
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-103602
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-103602

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-103602/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.