{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including pacioli-guard.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-107841 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade pacioli-guard to 0.10.0 or later.","what":"CVE-2026-107841 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in john-broadway pacioli, published on 9 Oct 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-107841 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-107841 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in john-broadway pacioli, published on 9 Oct 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-107841 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- pacioli-guard (PyPI): affected from 0.9.6; fixed in 0.10.0\n- pacioli-guard (PyPI): affected from 0.9.6; fixed in 0.10.0\n- pacioli-guard (PyPI): affected from 0.9.6; fixed in 0.10.0\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-107841/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-107841/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-107841","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-107841/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-107841","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4","PYSEC-2026-4246"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_modify","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"ERPNext governance library","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers with API consent scope can bypass document binding checks to cancel unrelated pre-existing documents, reversing ledger effects in ERPNext environments.","user_interaction":"required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":5.7,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-863","name":"Incorrect Authorization"}],"description":"pacioli provides least-privilege governance and a governed agent broker for ERPNext. From version 0.9.6 until version 0.10.0, the pacioli-guard document-layer consent gate allows nested cancellation operations to ride any consent established by an enclosing governed act without checking whether the marker authorizes cancellation. A credential with API Key Scope.require_consent can submit a caller-controlled Sales Invoice or other supported document under a valid human-minted submit marker and reach Document.cancel() for a different pre-existing submitted document, bypassing the marker's document and act binding, single-use spend, and denial audit. The unauthorized cancellation can reverse the target document's ledger effect; principals without a consent-gated grant are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"pacioli: A submit consent marker licensed cancellation of caller-named pre-existing documents","id":"CVE-2026-107841","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2026"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Contao: Protected page content is disclosed to anonymous visitors after contao.search.index_protected is disabled","id":"CVE-2026-107842"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.10.0"],"introduced":["0.9.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacioli-guard","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.10.0"],"introduced":["0.9.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacioli-guard","purl":"pkg:pypi/pacioli-guard","source":"GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.10.0"],"introduced":["0.9.6"],"last_affected":[],"package":"pacioli-guard","purl":"pkg:pypi/pacioli-guard","source":"PYSEC-2026-4246"}],"prev":{"headline":"yopass Prometheus metrics middleware allows remote memory exhaustion through unbounded method labels","id":"CVE-2026-107840"},"products":["pacioli"],"published":"2026-10-09","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-10-09","vendors":["john-broadway"]},"summary":"Attackers with API consent scope can bypass document binding checks to cancel unrelated pre-existing documents, reversing ledger effects in ERPNext environments.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-107841/"}