# CVE-2026-119905: Windows DNS Spoofing Vulnerability


- **Severity:** Medium 4.9 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 10 Nov 2026
- **Updated:** 12 Nov 2026
- **Also known as:** GHSA-5573-3qfp-gf8v

## What is CVE-2026-119905?

CVE-2026-119905 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Server 2016, published on 10 Nov 2026. 

### Official description

Improper input validation in Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Weakness: CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-119905?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-119905?

No fix has been published for CVE-2026-119905 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is CVE-2026-119905 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-119905 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Public exploit code:

- This shows how to poison a DNS log when you have dnsadmins and put in an UNC path, thus allowing you to capture the NetNTLMv2 Hash (github_poc): https://github.com/overgrowncarrot1/CVE-2026-119905-DNS-Log-Poisoning-UNC-Path

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-119905 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-119905 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Server 2016, published on 10 Nov 2026. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-119905 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Microsoft Windows Server 2016. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-119905/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-119905/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-119905
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-119905
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-119905

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-119905/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
