{"answers":{"affected":"11 open source packages ship an affected version, including go.etcd.io/etcd/v3, etcd and go.etcd.io/etcd. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-33343 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to a fixed version for your release line: 3.4.42, 3.5.28 or 3.6.9.","what":"CVE-2026-33343 is a missing authorization vulnerability in etcd-io etcd, published on 26 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-33343 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-33343 is a missing authorization vulnerability in etcd-io etcd, published on 26 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-33343 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 3.4.42, 3.5.28, 3.6.9\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 3.4.42\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 3.4.42\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.5.0-alpha.0; fixed in 3.5.28\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.5.0-alpha.0; fixed in 3.5.28\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.6.0-alpha.0; fixed in 3.6.9\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.6.0-alpha.0; fixed in 3.6.9\n- etcd (Bitnami): affected all versions; fixed in 3.4.42, 3.5.28, 3.6.9\n- go.etcd.io/etcd (Go): affected all versions; no fix listed\n- go.etcd.io/etcd (Go): affected all versions up to 3.3.27; no fix listed\n- go.etcd.io/etcd (Go): affected all versions up to 3.3.27; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-33343/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-33343/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-33343","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-33343/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-33343","record":{"aliases":["AZL-80954","BIT-etcd-2026-33343","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-33343","GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q","GO-2026-4808","MINI-29wg-66qg-qc26","MINI-56vg-7c6j-vcxh","MINI-6v4q-pm7h-8v2r","MINI-f2g9-8pmg-rq9q","MINI-pcjq-h8gf-824p","MINI-pcph-q5g6-6m55","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-33343"],"analysis":{"component_type":"database","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"etcd key-value store","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Authenticated users can bypass RBAC key restrictions via nested transactions, accessing the entire etcd data store.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"etcd","vendor":"etcd"}],"cvss":{"score":0,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-863","name":"Incorrect Authorization"}],"description":"etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, an authenticated user with RBAC restricted permissions on key ranges can use nested transactions to bypass all key-level authorization. This allows any authenticated user with direct access to etcd to effectively ignore all key range restrictions, accessing the entire etcd data store. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.","ecosystems":["Bitnami","Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"etcd: Nested etcd transactions bypass RBAC authorization checks","id":"CVE-2026-33343","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2026"},"n_packages":11,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"Dagu has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-27598: path traversal via %2F-encoded slashes in locateDAG","id":"CVE-2026-33344"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["3.4.42","3.5.28","3.6.9"],"introduced":["0","3.5.0","3.6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"etcd","purl":"pkg:bitnami/etcd","source":"BIT-etcd-2026-33343"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd","source":"GO-2026-4808"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["3.3.27"],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["3.3.27"],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd","source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.4.42","3.5.28","3.6.9"],"introduced":["0","3.5.0-alpha.0","3.6.0-alpha.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GO-2026-4808"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.4.42"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.4.42"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.5.28"],"introduced":["3.5.0-alpha.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.5.28"],"introduced":["3.5.0-alpha.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.6.9"],"introduced":["3.6.0-alpha.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.6.9"],"introduced":["3.6.0-alpha.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GHSA-rfx7-8w68-q57q"}],"prev":{"headline":"LoLLMs WEBUI has unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /api/proxy endpoint","id":"CVE-2026-33340"},"products":["etcd"],"published":"2026-03-26","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Etcd-io Improper Authentication vulnerability","id":"CVE-2021-28235","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-04-04"},{"cvss_score":8.8,"headline":"etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs","id":"CVE-2026-33413","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-26"},{"cvss_score":7.5,"headline":"Denial of service in n/a","id":"CVE-2022-34038","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-08-22"},{"cvss_score":6.8,"headline":"go.etcd.io/etcd Authentication Bypass","id":"CVE-2018-16886","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2019-01-14"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"etcd: gRPC client listener does not enforce `--client-crl-file` certificate revocation","id":"CVE-2026-59818","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-07-08"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Improper Input Validation in etcd","id":"CVE-2020-15106","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-08-05"},{"cvss_score":6.5,"headline":"Improper Input Validation in etcd","id":"CVE-2020-15112","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-08-05"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-03-26","vendors":["etcd-io"]},"summary":"Authenticated users can bypass RBAC key restrictions via nested transactions, accessing the entire etcd data store.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-33343/"}