{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including openclaw. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-35647 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for CVE-2026-35647 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"CVE-2026-35647 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw, published on 10 Apr 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-35647 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-35647 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw, published on 10 Apr 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-35647 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- openclaw (npm): affected all versions up to 2026.3.24; no fix listed\n- openclaw (npm): affected all versions up to 2026.3.24; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-35647/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-35647/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-35647","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-35647/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-35647","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-9wqx-g2cw-vc7r","MINI-v6rj-3w55-6w3q"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"OpenClaw messaging server","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can bypass direct message policies by sending verification notices to unpaired users, circumventing intended access controls.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"VulnCheck","cpe":[{"product":"openclaw","vendor":"openclaw"}],"cvss":{"score":6.9,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-288","name":"Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel"}],"description":"OpenClaw before 2026.3.25 contains an access control vulnerability where verification notices bypass DM policy checks and reply to unpaired peers. Attackers can send verification notices to users outside allowed direct message policies by exploiting insufficient access validation before message transmission.","ecosystems":["npm"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":false,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.25 - Direct Message Policy Bypass via Verification Notices","id":"CVE-2026-35647","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"npm","product":"openclaw:openclaw","products":["openclaw:openclaw"],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2026"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.22 - Policy Bypass via Unvalidated Queued Node Actions","id":"CVE-2026-35648"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"npm","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["2026.3.24"],"package":"openclaw","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-9wqx-g2cw-vc7r"},{"ecosystem":"npm","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":["2026.3.24"],"package":"openclaw","purl":"pkg:npm/openclaw","source":"GHSA-9wqx-g2cw-vc7r"}],"prev":{"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.25 - Pre-Authentication Rate-Limit Bypass in Webhook Token Validation","id":"CVE-2026-35646"},"products":["OpenClaw"],"published":"2026-04-10","related":[{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Security feature bypass in OpenClaw","id":"CVE-2026-28363","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-02-27"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Code injection in n/a","id":"CVE-2026-30741","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-11"},{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.28 - Privilege Escalation via Missing Caller Scope Validation in Device Pair Approval","id":"CVE-2026-33579","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-31"},{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.11 - Privilege Escalation via Unvalidated Scope in device.token.rotate","id":"CVE-2026-32922","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-29"},{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.11 - Approval Bypass via Unrecognized Script Runners","id":"CVE-2026-32978","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-29"},{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.12 - Scope Elevation in WebSocket Shared-Auth Connections","id":"CVE-2026-22172","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-20"},{"cvss_score":9.4,"headline":"OpenClaw \u003c 2026.2.14 - Remote Code Execution via Node Invoke Approval Bypass","id":"CVE-2026-28466","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-03-05"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-06-23","vendors":["OpenClaw"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass direct message policies by sending verification notices to unpaired users, circumventing intended access controls.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-35647/"}