{"answers":{"affected":"2 open source packages ship an affected version, including froxlor/froxlor. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-41233 exists.","fix":"Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to 2.3.6 or later.","what":"CVE-2026-41233 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in froxlor, published on 23 Apr 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-41233 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-41233 is a medium-severity missing authorization vulnerability in froxlor, published on 23 Apr 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-41233 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 2.3.6\n- froxlor/froxlor (Packagist): affected all versions; fixed in 2.3.6\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-41233/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-41233/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-41233","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-41233/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-41233","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-jvx4-xv3m-hrj4"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation","denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Server administration software","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"A reseller can bypass domain quotas by manipulating the adminid parameter, potentially exhausting another admin's quota and escalating privileges.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"froxlor","vendor":"froxlor"}],"cvss":{"score":5.4,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-863","name":"Incorrect Authorization"}],"description":"Froxlor is open source server administration software. Prior to version 2.3.6, in `Domains.add()`, the `adminid` parameter is accepted from user input and used without validation when the calling reseller does not have the `customers_see_all` permission. This allows a reseller to attribute newly created domains to any other admin, bypassing their own domain quota (since the wrong admin's `domains_used` counter is incremented) and potentially exhausting another admin's quota. Version 2.3.6 fixes the issue.","ecosystems":["Packagist"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Froxlor has a Reseller Domain Quota Bypass via Unvalidated adminid Parameter in Domains.add()","id":"CVE-2026-41233","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Packagist","product":null,"products":[],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2026"},"n_packages":2,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Froxlor: BIND Zone File Injection via TXT Record Content","id":"CVE-2026-41234"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["2.3.6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-jvx4-xv3m-hrj4"},{"ecosystem":"Packagist","fixed":["2.3.6"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"froxlor/froxlor","purl":"pkg:composer/froxlor/froxlor","source":"GHSA-jvx4-xv3m-hrj4"}],"prev":{"headline":"Froxlor has an Email Sender Alias Domain Ownership Bypass via Wrong Array Index Allows Cross-Customer Email Spoofing","id":"CVE-2026-41232"},"products":["froxlor"],"published":"2026-04-23","related":[{"cvss_score":10,"headline":"Froxlor has Local File Inclusion via path traversal in API `def_language` parameter that leads to Remote Code Execution","id":"CVE-2026-41228","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-23"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Improper Link Resolution Before File Access in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-6069","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-11-10"},{"cvss_score":9.9,"headline":"Code Injection in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-0671","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-02-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-3173","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-06-09"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness in froxlor/froxlor","id":"CVE-2023-1307","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-03-10"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Froxlor SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2021-42325","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-10-12"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Information disclosure in n/a","id":"CVE-2015-5959","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2017-09-06"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-04-23","vendors":["froxlor"]},"summary":"A reseller can bypass domain quotas by manipulating the adminid parameter, potentially exhausting another admin's quota and escalating privileges.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-41233/"}