{"answers":{"affected":"8 open source packages ship an affected version, including django and Django. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-4277 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade django to a fixed version for your release line: 4.2.30, 5.2.13 or 6.0.4.","what":"CVE-2026-4277 is a critical missing authorization vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 7 Apr 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-4277 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-4277 is a critical missing authorization vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 7 Apr 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-4277 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- django (Bitnami): affected from 4.2.0; fixed in 4.2.30, 5.2.13, 6.0.4\n- django (PyPI): affected from 4.2; fixed in 4.2.30, 5.2.13, 6.0.4\n- django (PyPI): affected from 4.2; fixed in 4.2.30\n- django (PyPI): affected from 5.2; fixed in 5.2.13\n- django (PyPI): affected from 6.0; fixed in 6.0.4\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 4.2; fixed in 4.2.30\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 5.2; fixed in 5.2.13\n- Django (PyPI): affected from 6.0; fixed in 6.0.4\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-4277/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-4277/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-4277","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-4277/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-4277","record":{"aliases":["BIT-django-2026-4277","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-4277","ECHO-400a-1b13-ae60","GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg","MINI-8rhj-qhpr-rxw7","MINI-rccg-hj25-rhxf","PYSEC-2026-52","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-4277"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["privilege_escalation","data_modify"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Django web framework","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can bypass permission checks to add unauthorized inline model instances via forged POST requests in Django's GenericInlineModelAdmin.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"missing_authorization"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"DSF","cpe":[{"product":"django","vendor":"djangoproject"}],"cvss":{"score":9.8,"severity":"critical","source":"cisa-adp","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-862","name":"Missing Authorization"}],"description":"An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.\nAdd permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of\r\nforged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.","ecosystems":["Bitnami","PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin","id":"CVE-2026-4277","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":"djangoproject:django","products":["djangoproject:django"],"type":"missing_authorization","year":"2026"},"n_packages":8,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Cross-site scripting in Simple Download Counter","id":"CVE-2026-4278"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["4.2.30","5.2.13","6.0.4"],"introduced":["4.2.0","5.2.0","6.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:bitnami/django","source":"BIT-django-2026-4277"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.2.30"],"introduced":["4.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["5.2.13"],"introduced":["5.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["6.0.4"],"introduced":["6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"Django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.2.30","5.2.13","6.0.4"],"introduced":["4.2","5.2","6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"PYSEC-2026-52"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.2.30"],"introduced":["4.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["5.2.13"],"introduced":["5.2"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["6.0.4"],"introduced":["6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwg"}],"prev":{"headline":"LibreChat RAG API, version 0.7.0, contains a log-injection vulnerability that allows attackers to forge log entries.","id":"CVE-2026-4276"},"products":["Django"],"published":"2026-04-07","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection in HasKey(lhs, rhs) on Oracle","id":"CVE-2024-53908","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-42005","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django bypasses validation when using one form field to upload multiple files","id":"CVE-2023-31047","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-05-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django `Trunc()` and `Extract()` database functions vulnerable to SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2022-34265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL Injection in Django","id":"CVE-2021-35042","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-02"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Django","id":"CVE-2020-7471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"yes","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"total"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-06-23","vendors":["djangoproject"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass permission checks to add unauthorized inline model instances via forged POST requests in Django's GenericInlineModelAdmin.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-4277/"}