# CVE-2026-43023: Bluetooth: SCO: fix race conditions in sco_sock_connect()

> A race condition in the Linux kernel Bluetooth SCO socket connection allows concurrent access leading to use-after-free, potentially enabling code execution or privilege escalation.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 1 May 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2026-43023, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-43023, GHSA-wvxr-8p4p-pcpq, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2404-CVE-2026-43023, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-43023

## What is CVE-2026-43023?

CVE-2026-43023 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 1 May 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: SCO: fix race conditions in sco_sock_connect()

sco_sock_connect() checks sk_state and sk_type without holding
the socket lock. Two concurrent connect() syscalls on the same
socket can both pass the check and enter sco_connect(), leading
to use-after-free.

The buggy scenario involves three participants and was confirmed
with additional logging instrumentation:

  Thread A (connect):    HCI disconnect:      Thread B (connect):

  sco_sock_connect(sk)                        sco_sock_connect(sk)
  sk_state==BT_OPEN                           sk_state==BT_OPEN
  (pass, no lock)                             (pass, no lock)
  sco_connect(sk):                            sco_connect(sk):
    hci_dev_lock                                hci_dev_lock
    hci_connect_sco                               <- blocked
      -> hcon1
    sco_conn_add->conn1
    lock_sock(sk)
    sco_chan_add:
      conn1->sk = sk
      sk->conn = conn1
    sk_state=BT_CONNECT
    release_sock
    hci_dev_unlock
                           hci_dev_lock
                           sco_conn_del:
                             lock_sock(sk)
                             sco_chan_del:
                               sk->conn=NULL
                               conn1->sk=NULL
                               sk_state=
                                 BT_CLOSED
                               SOCK_ZAPPED
                             release_sock
                           hci_dev_unlock
                                                  (unblocked)
                                                  hci_connect_sco
                                                    -> hcon2
                                                  sco_conn_add
                                                    -> conn2
                                                  lock_sock(sk)
                                                  sco_chan_add:
                                                    sk->conn=conn2
                                                  sk_state=
                                                    BT_CONNECT
                                                  // zombie sk!
                                                  release_sock
                                                  hci_dev_unlock

Thread B revives a BT_CLOSED + SOCK_ZAPPED socket back to
BT_CONNECT. Subsequent cleanup triggers double sock_put() and
use-after-free. Meanwhile conn1 is leaked as it was orphaned
when sco_conn_del() cleared the association.

Fix this by:
- Moving lock_sock() before the sk_state/sk_type checks in
  sco_sock_connect() to serialize concurrent connect attempts
- Fixing the sk_type != SOCK_SEQPACKET check to actually
  return the error instead of just assigning it
- Adding a state re-check in sco_connect() after lock_sock()
  to catch state changes during the window between the locks
- Adding sco_pi(sk)->conn check in sco_chan_add() to prevent
  double-attach of a socket to multiple connections
- Adding hci_conn_drop() on sco_chan_add failure to prevent
  HCI connection leaks

Weakness: CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-43023?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-43023?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-43023 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-43023 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-43023 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-43023 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 1 May 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-43023 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-43023/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-43023/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43023
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-43023

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-43023/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
