CVE-2026-43118 btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay

What is CVE-2026-43118?

CVE-2026-43118 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 6 May 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay

When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0. This is to signal during log replay (in overwrite_item()), that we should not set the i_size since we only logged that an inode exists, so the i_size of the inode in the subvolume tree must be preserved (as when we log new names or that an inode exists, we don't log extents).

This works fine except when we have already logged an inode in full mode or it's the first time we are logging an inode created in a past transaction, that inode has a new i_size of 0 and then we log a new name for the inode (due to a new hardlink or a rename), in which case we log an i_size of 0 for the inode and a generation of 0, which causes the log replay code to not update the inode's i_size to 0 (in overwrite_item()).

An example scenario:

mkdir /mnt/dir xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64K" /mnt/dir/foo

sync

xfs_io -c "truncate 0" -c "fsync" /mnt/dir/foo

ln /mnt/dir/foo /mnt/dir/bar

xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/dir

<power fail>

After log replay the file remains with a size of 64K. This is because when we first log the inode, when we fsync file foo, we log its current i_size of 0, and then when we create a hard link we log again the inode in exists mode (LOG_INODE_EXISTS) but we set a generation of 0 for the inode item we add to the log tree, so during log replay overwrite_item() sees that the generation is 0 and i_size is 0 so we skip updating the inode's i_size from 64K to 0.

Fix this by making sure at fill_inode_item() we always log the real generation of the inode if it was logged in the current transaction with the i_size we logged before. Also if an inode created in a previous transaction is logged in exists mode only, make sure we log the i_size stored in the inode item located from the commit root, so that if we log multiple times that the inode exists we get the correct i_size.

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-43118?

It affects 1 product.

Products include Linux kernel.

How do I fix CVE-2026-43118?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Is CVE-2026-43118 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-43118 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

• CVE-2026-53266 Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write Exploited High 8.8
• CVE-2013-6282 Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation Exploited High 8.8
• CVE-2022-0185 Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow Exploited High 8.4
• CVE-2013-2094 Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation Exploited High 8.4
• CVE-2026-53362 Linux Kernel Unspecified Exploited High 7.8

All Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Sources

• CVE record
• NVD
• OSV
• GitHub advisory
• How this page is made

Also known as AZL-85838, BELL-CVE-2026-43118, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-43118, GHSA-hwg8-9qf4-vr6j, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2026-43118, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2026-43118 and 4 more.